Virtuous Person, Virtuous Citizen
Articulate a moral dilemma wherein one has to show a specific virtue or virtues (it can be any virtue or virtues including honesty, courage, charity/generosity, compassion, etc.)
What is the moral dilemma about?
What virtue or virtues should be shown? (You are here selecting the best course of action)
Why is that virtue or those virtues to be shown?
How should the virtue or virtues be expressed, and why in that manner?
Apply Aristotle's golden mean to the dilemma.
Tell us how the dilemma involves conflict moral duties (loyalty to community versus to self, professional versus familial duties, national or personal obligations).
The dilemma must be a situation in which a choice has to be made.
The Whistleblowing Dilemma: Courage & Honesty vs. Loyalty & Self-Preservation
Dilemma: You are a data analyst at a pharmaceutical company working on a new drug trial. During your analysis, you discover significant discrepancies in the data, suggesting the drug may have serious side effects not reported. You know alerting authorities could expose the company's wrongdoing, potentially leading to job loss, legal repercussions, and damage to your reputation. However, staying silent could put countless lives at risk.
Virtues Needed:
- Courage:Facing the potential personal consequences of exposing the truth.
- Honesty:Upholding integrity and refusing to participate in deception.
- Protecting human life:The potential harm to patients outweighs personal concerns.
- Maintaining social trust:Exposing fraud promotes accountability and safeguards public health.
- Gather concrete evidence:Strengthen your case and avoid accusations based on speculation.
- Seek confidential channels:Report to regulatory bodies or independent journalists to protect yourself.
- Act with professionalism:Communicate calmly and objectively, focusing on facts and concerns.
- Reckless self-preservation:Ignoring the issue out of fear, prioritizing personal safety over ethical responsibility.
- Rash public exposure:Making accusations without proper evidence, potentially causing unnecessary panic and harming the company unjustly.