While the landscape is evolving, some major organized sports in the US have historically lobbied for the continuation of the prohibition on sports betting due to several concerns:

Integrity of the Games:

• Match-fixing: The biggest fear is that legalized betting could create incentives for players, coaches, or referees to manipulate games for personal gain. This could include point shaving, influencing outcomes, or leaking inside information. Leagues argue this would damage the integrity of the sport and erode public trust.

Control and Revenue:

• Loss of control: Leagues worry that legalized betting could take away their control over how their product is gambled on. They might lose out on potential revenue streams or face regulatory restrictions they feel hinder their business model.

• Competition for gambling revenue: Leagues might see legal sportsbooks as competitors for fan attention and spending, diverting revenue away from ticket sales, merchandise, and other traditional sources.

Social Concerns:

• Problem gambling: Some leagues express concern about the potential for increased problem gambling and its negative social impacts, particularly among vulnerable populations.

• Addiction and youth gambling: Leagues might worry that easier access to sports betting could lead to addiction, especially among younger fans.

However, the landscape is changing:

• Shifting opinions: Some leagues, like the NBA, have softened their stance on legalized betting, recognizing its potential benefits and the difficulty of complete prohibition in the digital age.

• Potential revenue and partnerships: Leagues see the potential for significant revenue through licensing deals with sportsbooks and data partnerships.

• Public opinion: Public support for legalized sports betting is growing, putting pressure on leagues to adapt.

• States legalizing: Many US states have already legalized sports betting, forcing leagues to engage with the issue rather than simply oppose it.

Overall, the debate on sports betting and its impact on organized sports is complex and evolving. While concerns about integrity and social issues remain, the changing legal landscape and potential benefits are pushing some leagues to reconsider their positions.

It’s important to note that this is a simplified overview, and specific arguments and positions may vary depending on the individual league and its circumstances.