Why the missile crisis end peacefully
According to Robert Kennedy, why did the missile crisis end peacefully?
Essays should address the following questions:
• Once the crisis began, what options did JFK’s advisors present to him, and why did the president choose the one he did?
• What factors outside the U.S. contributed to the outcome of the crisis?
• What did Robert Kennedy see as the key turning points in the crisis?
• How did Robert Kennedy assess his brother’s handling of the missile crisis? Do you think
he was unbiased in that assessment?
Keep the phrase “according to Robert Kennedy” firmly in mind. There are countless sources
According to Robert Kennedy, the missile crisis ended peacefully because:
- President Kennedy chose a blockade over a military strike. Robert Kennedy argued that a blockade would give the Soviets time to think and avoid a direct confrontation. He also believed that it would show the world that the United States was acting cautiously and responsibly.
- Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev was willing to back down. Khrushchev realized that a nuclear war would be devastating for both sides, and he was not prepared to risk it. He also faced domestic pressure from his own advisors, who warned him against pursuing a military conflict with the United States.
- Both sides were willing to compromise. Kennedy eventually agreed to remove US missiles from Turkey in exchange for the Soviet removal of missiles from Cuba. This compromise allowed both sides to save face and avoid a direct confrontation.
- A military strike against Cuba. This was the most extreme option, and it carried a high risk of escalating into a nuclear war.
- A naval blockade to prevent Soviet ships from delivering more missiles to Cuba. This was a less risky option, but it could have led to a prolonged standoff between the two superpowers.
- A diplomatic solution. This would involve negotiating with the Soviets to remove the missiles from Cuba. This was the most difficult option, but it was also the most desirable.
- The domestic situation in the Soviet Union. Khrushchev was facing pressure from his own advisors, who were warning him against pursuing a military conflict with the United States.
- The international community. There was widespread opposition to any military action in Cuba, and the United Nations was working to mediate a solution.
- The nuclear arms race. Both the United States and the Soviet Union had large stockpiles of nuclear weapons, and both sides knew that a nuclear war would be devastating.
- President Kennedy's decision to choose a blockade over a military strike. This decision avoided a direct confrontation between the two superpowers and gave the Soviets time to think.
- Khrushchev's decision to back down. Khrushchev realized that a nuclear war would be devastating for both sides, and he was not prepared to risk it.
- The willingness of both sides to compromise. Kennedy agreed to remove US missiles from Turkey in exchange for the Soviet removal of missiles from Cuba. This compromise allowed both sides to save face and avoid a direct confrontation.
- The role of back-channel diplomacy. Both the United States and the Soviet Union used back-channel diplomacy to communicate with each other during the crisis. This allowed them to avoid inflammatory public statements and to explore possible solutions without risking a direct confrontation.
- The role of luck. Some historians argue that the Cuban Missile Crisis ended peacefully because both sides were lucky. For example, Khrushchev's decision to back down may have been influenced by the fact that he was unaware of the full extent of the US nuclear arsenal