10 Problems with Qualitative Date
Book:
• Babbie, E. (2016). The basics of social research (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. ISBN: 978-1-305-50307-6
• This is only an online book so I apologize for the grainy photos.
Read Chapter 13 in provided link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nXPogwrlei1dXHFw4SU5w3dNyQSGpHgo/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=106796094328861362768&rtpof=true&sd=true
Watch Video:
10 Problems with Qualitative Date: https://youtu.be/wl5lS3MQbzo
Assignment:
• Please watch the YouTube video which discusses problems associated with qualitative research methods in market research:
• Next, respond to the following questions:
o Have you ever thought about ways that research methods can be used in the private sector?
o Have you considered applying your psychology degree in fields like industrial psychology, marketing, or engineering psychology? **I am not getting a psychology degree, I am getting a human services degree, so not sure how this should be answered…
o Do you agree with the speaker's comments about the value and limitations of working with a small sample size (e.g., in a focus group setting)?
o How would you seek to generalize results from a small qualitative study?
o The speaker discusses several ways that qualitative research is mishandled by businesses. Do you suppose that behavioral sciences researchers ever fall into these same traps? If so, which ones? (Be specific.)
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it's anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are 'recoded' and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller's unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number