150 years ago

 

 

 

Even 150 years ago, when Victorian critic & poet Matthew Arnold served as a “middle-man” for traditional high literary culture to the large, expanding and content-hungry English middle-classes, signs pointed clearly to the Information Overkill and Data Glut of our own times. There was just so much being produced, that without some portal, or distillation, the superabundance was…ironically…useless.

As a way of acknowledging density instead of sheer mass, Arnold promoted the idea of “touchstone” passages within longer works of poetry and prose (see definition below). These were patches of just a few lines/sentences which contained, in concentrate, themes more diffused throughout an entire work. These saved time, and focused attention, as both resources were speeding towards the dead ends we can sense before us today.

For these two (2) Short Take Writing Assignments, you will choose a passage, from any of the course material – period/author introductions, poetry, prose, letters, journals, etc. that encapsulates and crystalizes issues and themes found in the larger framework of the course, including those that may have a personal relevance to you as reader and writer.

Assignment # 1: Short Take The First (DUE Wednesday September 8th by 9:00 am) will be drawn from the reading of Weeks 1 through 4; Assignment # 3: Short Take The Second (DUE Friday October 8th by 9:00 am) will be drawn from the reading of Weeks 5 through 8. At the top of each essay, students will quote, single-spaced, the “touchstone” passage, (no more than five or six sentences, or lines of poetry). After a space, students will compose, double-spaced, their response.

As this is an English class, spelling, grammar, style, usage, mechanics, etc. will all count! Please use Times New Roman, 12-point font. The response should be a minimum of 250 to 300 well-chosen, multiply drafted, edited, and proofread words.

One objective of these assignments is to encourage students to be active readers, making marks, taking notes, highlighting passages that have a larger course-wide and personal resonance.

Sample Solution

owns the device, many insurance companies have provided coverage of the therapy by using a case-by-case system, determined by the medical necessity of treatment. The Musella Foundation for Brain Tumor Research and Information created an assistance program from patients needing TTF therapy for recurrent GBM. Also, certain patients who live in the United States and meet specific income conditions can receive up to $5,000 per year for the treatment (ECRI Institute 2016). According to the New York Times, Novocure offers the treatment for free for patients without health coverage (Grady 2014). Prognosis When patients used Optune (TTF therapy) for 12 hours or more a day and also took TMZ during the same period, 86% of patients increased their survival rate compared to just taking TMZ alone. The more compliant patients were with using the device, the better their outcome was. In order to get the best results and maximal survival benefit, patients should aim to use the device for at least 18 hours a day. For patients who had compliance over 90%, their median survival was 24.9 months and their 5-year survival rate was 29.3% (Ram 2017). When dealing with glioblastoma (GBM), the median overall survival rate is around 15 months and the rate of 5-year survival is estimated to be 5% (Tykocki 2018). Conclusion In conclusion, hyperthermia therapy and tumor treating field therapy come from very different scientific concepts, but both aim to kill cancer cells and save cancer patient’s lives. Hyperthermia treatment was created after witnessing patients with high fevers achieve remission and tumor treating field therapy was created after someone thought of the idea. Although hyperthermia therapy has been since the ancient times, not much has changed with the process since the early 1900’s and it is still used in the same fashion today, if used at all. Even though in addition with radiation, hyperthermia therapy shows therapeutic results, very few cancer treatment centers boast about their use of this specific therapy. It is covered by Medicare and some insurance companies though, so we can assume it is still used today. On the other hand, Tumor Treating Fields have only recently been discovered and on the market for doctors to prescribe and for patients to use. Since discovering the success of the treatment, many clinical and preclinical trials are in the works and they will hopefully achieve promising results. Already, the amount of time it has added for patients with GBM is lifechanging. This technology is one of the first to change the life expectancy for GBM in a very long time. Also, it has very little reported side effects for everything that it can do. There are many benefits to this treatment and very few, if any drawbacks, exce

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.