6 fact-finding techniques

 

P​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​art A – Identify 6 fact-finding techniques (observation, research, reviewing documentation, interviews, and surveys) explain each how you would apply 3 of those techniques if you were asked to collect information regarding how to improve the learning management system we use in this class . Part B – Define and provide an example for the different multiplicity relationships (one-to-one, one-to-many, many-to-many). Assignment Guidelines Do “not” include the questions with your answers. The submission should demonstrate your understanding of the assigned material and be in the order of 650+ words in length Your submission must be original, include supporti​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​ng sentences using the terms, concepts, and theories with the page number or website from the required readings or other material. Your submission should paraphrase the material you reference, restrict your use of direct quotes (copy and paste) to less than 15% of the submission (the grade will be impacted if you exceed this limit). There are writing guidelines in the syllabus – use good judgement, the submission must be well organized and convey your understanding of the assigned material. Provide citations and references in APA style. Name your document Last Name_Assignment5 (i.e. Smith_Assignment5). CO5 Examine the rudiments of the Structured Query Language (​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​SQL).

 

 

 

Sample Solution

When tasked with collecting information regarding how to improve the learning management system used in this class, I would use several fact-finding techniques such as observation , interviews and surveys.

Observation involves recording one’s observations while using the system or talking to other users so as to gain insights that are not always accessible through traditional data sources (Krizan & Meriac ,2019). For instance, observing user behavior when accessing different features of the system could reveal areas where improvements could be made due to certain design limitations or lack of clarity with regards to instructions etc.

In contrast, interviewing students about their experiences might provide further insight into potential issues which should be addressed . Questions can range from technical matters such as ease of use or loading speed ;to more subjective ones like user satisfaction levels and any recommendations they have for improvement (Leedy & Ormrod, 2010).

Finally, surveys are another great way of obtaining a bigger picture view on what features work well and which do not since it allows users to respond anonymously if they wish whilst still providing detailed data points on time spent using certain functions etc. This can then help inform decisions around how resources should be allocated when attempting to tackle identified problems.


regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.