8 moral disengagement techniques.

at
Categories
Tags

 

Please read over the article found here:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-web-violence/201806/what-is-dehumanization-anywayLinks to an external site.
Answer the following:
1. List and briefly define the 8 moral disengagement techniques.
2. Which of these 8 do you think occurs most frequently? Why do you think this?
3. List and define the 5 action steps you can take to avoid these 8 disengagements.
4. Which one of these 5 do you think would be easiest for people to do? Which would be the most difficult? Explain both answers.

 

Sample Solution

8 moral disengagement techniques

Moral disengagement is the conditional endorsement of transgressive behavior through the use of any eight psychosocial mechanisms and is apparent in sport when players rationalize harmful behaviors such as injuring or deliberately fouling opponents. Within his social cognitive theory (SCT) of the moral thought and action, Albert Bandura outlined eight mechanisms of moral disengagement. The eight mechanisms are moral justification; euphemistic labeling; advantageous comparison; displacement or responsibility, diffusion of responsibility, distortion of consequences; dehumanization; and attribution of blame. The eight mechanism operate by minimizing or eliminating unpleasant emotional reactions (e.g. guilt, shame) normally associated with transgressive acts, therefore promoting such behavior.

o support for and against the great man theory. The suggestion that some people are natural leaders and therefore must have been born with some of the traits that make a good leader. However, individuals can learn and develop traits that will make them a good leader. Being self-aware and education goes somewhat to developing an individual. Herbert Spencer’s theory supports the idea that the situation and group characteristic are a key element of good leadership. Stogdill first survey indicated that an individual does not become a leader solely because he or she possesses certain traits. Rather, the traits that leaders possess must be relevant to the situation in which the leader is functioning or found them self in . In today’s society leadership is in general, not a standalone individual. The leader is supported by a team of advisors to guide the leader in making an informed decision. What makes a good leader is how the decision is communicated to the followers.

As we have heard earlier in the paper, Charles de Gaulle was brought up in a patriotic environment. His upbringing shaped his beliefs and his determination to peruse them. Therefore he was not born patriotic, this was learned in adolescence. We have heard that he was intellectual, again a consequence of his upbringing. Encouraged to learn, he followed his mother’s desire to read and digest information. These basic foundations set de Gaulle up in to continue this later on in his military and political career.

Trait Theory Analysis

The trait theory is intuitively appealing. It fits clearly with the notion that leaders are the individuals who are out front and leading the way in our society. This fits with the concept of a hierarchical organisation that is seen in businesses, to include government, where most countries have an elected or appointed leader. However, it could be argued that elected or appointed leaders are not necessarily good leaders and they are not necessary elected for the traits they display. Therefore not all leaders will display traits that are link

This question has been answered.

Get Answer