Consequence-based moral theories

at
Categories
Tags

 

 

Evaluate consequence-based moral theories.

Instructions

Creating the perfect boss Your company, Ye Old Paper Mill, recently experienced some organizational chart changes, mostly related to management positions. After posting low profits and even lower employment satisfaction scores, the CEO decided it was time for a change. The CEO, who prefers consequentialist views when it comes to ethical decisions, approached you, along with the rest of the human resources department, and tasked the team with weighing consequentialist ethical theories and selecting which theory would be best for potential managers. For this assessment, you will draft a proposal that addresses the following questions:

· What are key features of consequentialist theories?

· What are the differences between the consequentialist theories?

· How does happiness and pleasure factor in to these theories? Remember employee satisfaction is at an all-time low.

· What are the pros and cons of each view for the company if the majority of its employees would follow one of the particular theories?

· Would it be possible for a manager, who follows a different ethical perspective, to effectively manage subordinates who follow a particular consequentialist theory?

· Select and defend which consequentialist theory for management would be best for the company.

Your properly formatted proposal will need to include the following sections: Introduction: Explain why you are sending this proposal. Provide an overview of the issue and discuss the task from the CEO.

1. Address the questions listed above with applicable support and research

2. Conclusion: In this part, you will wrap up the proposal and select and defend which consequentialist theory for management would be best for the company.

3. Proper Proposal Formatting: This a professional document and needs to b

Sample Solution

Consequence-based moral theories

Consequentialism is a type of teleological theory. Consequentialism is based on two principles: whether an act is right or wrong depends only on the results of that act; the more good consequences an act produces, the better or more right that act. It gives us this guidance when faced with a moral dilemma: a person should choose the action that maximizes good consequences. And it gives this general guidance on how to live: people should live so as to maximize good consequences. Different forms of consequentialism differ over what the good thing is that should be maximized. Utilitarianism states that people should maximize human welfare or well-being (which they used to call “utility” – hence the name). Hedonism states that people should maximize human pleasure.

Recognizing de Gaulle’s assets and potential open doors quickly cause to notice the attributes he handled and how they could have added to his initiative style. In the mid twentieth century, administration attributes were contemplated to figure out what made specific individuals extraordinary pioneers . The hypothesis that got from this examination was known as the “Incomparable Man Theory”.

Attribute Approach
Academic investigations have shown that there is a wide range of hypothetical ways to deal with initiative. In some of their exploration papers the characteristic methodology proceeds to show up and accordingly it would pass on you to accept that there should be believability in this hypothesis. All along of any writing on de Gaulle, he and his initiative style are portrayed through his trademark. The solid referring to of de Gaulle’s qualities prompts recognizable attributes and draw assessment of de Gaulle from this perspective.

The characteristic hypothesis was one of the primary deliberate endeavors to concentrate on authority . It zeroed in on distinguishing the natural characteristics and qualities presented by incredible social, political, and military pioneers . It was accepted that individuals were brought into the world with these qualities and as it were “incredible individuals had them .

During the twentieth century the methodology was tested and recommended that no reliable arrangement of attributes separated pioneers from non-pioneers across an assortment of circumstances . Late years have seen the resurgence in the attribute approach; to put it plainly, the quality methodology is fit as a fiddle . It started with the accentuation on distinguishing the characteristics of an extraordinary individual; next, it moved to remember the effect of a circumstance for authority; and most as of late, it has shift back to re-stress the basic job of qualities in compelling initiative .

Antiquarian Thomas Carlyle additionally impacted this hypothesis of initiative, at one point expressing that, “The historical backdrop of the world is nevertheless the account of extraordinary men.” According to Carlyle, viable pioneers are those skilled with divine motivation and the right qualities . Research has demonstrated that the “Incomparable man” hypothesis is defective in certain perspectives. One angle being that extraordinary pioneers are brought into the world with attributes that make a decent pioneer and they can’t be educated or created over the long haul with experience. Social scientist Herbert Spencer recommended that the pioneers were results of the general public in which they lived. In The Study of Sociology, Spencer expressed, “you should concede that the beginning of an incredible man relies upon the long series of mind boggling impacts which has delivered the race in which he shows up, and the social state into which that race has gradually developed

This question has been answered.

Get Answer