Pt C.A, 81 years old, white, male, complaining of three episodes of emesis, preceded by nausea in the last 2 days, decreased appetite., headache, and chills. Since this morning patient is feeling very sick, and weak after he is having frequent episodes of voluminous, watery diarrhea, (5 episodes) no mucus, no blood and comes with abdominal discomfort, cramping, and blooding. 101F fever is constated at the office, HR 122 , ta 100/70 mmhg, RR 22
Pt has a history of benign prostatic hypertrophy, and he was treated for a urinary tract infection treated with ciprofloxacin for 10 days last month.
Another detail can be fabricated.
Pt history
Diabetes type 2, last A1c 6.2,
Compensate diabetes continues with glimepiride 1mg after breakfast. Metformin 500 mg 40 minutes after breakfast and dinner.
HTN controlled: continue losartan 100mg 1tablet daily after breakfast.
Hyperlipidemia: Atorvastatin 20 mg tab PO 1 tablet daily.
Vit D deficiency. Vit D 50,000 U weekly for 4 weeks, them Vit D 1000U weekly OTC.
Dx acute bacterial gastroenteritis is secondary to Clostridiodes difficile infection. (An older patient who’s presenting with fever, has a white [blood cell] count and has more than 3 diarrheal stools in 24 hours, this kind of patient will fit into the picture of a diagnosis of C diff.) help to support main diagnosis. You should include more details here to support the Dx.
Diferencial DX to be included.
Acute gastroenteritis secondary to the food-borne pathogen.
IBS
Diarrhea antibiotic associate.
Treatment.
Fluid repletion — The most critical therapy in diarrheal illness is rehydration, preferably by the oral route. Diluted fruit juices and flavored soft drinks along with saltine crackers and broths or soups may meet the fluid and salt needs in patients with mild illness.
The electrolyte concentrations of fluids used for sweat replacement (eg, Gatorade) are not equivalent to oral rehydration solutions, although they may be sufficient for the otherwise healthy patient with diarrhea who is not hypovolemic.
Encourage increased fluid intake of 1.5 to 2.5 liters/24 hours plus 200 ml for each loose stool restrict the intake of caffeine, milk, and dairy products.
Encourage the client to eat foods rich in potassium.
As the patient is anorectic and has nausea and vomiting, a short period of consuming only liquids will not be harmful.
Boiled starches and cereals (eg, potatoes, noodles, rice, wheat, and oat) with salt are indicated in patients with watery diarrhea; crackers, bananas, soup, and boiled vegetables may also be consumed.
Foods with high-fat content should be avoided until the gut function returns to normal after a severe bout of diarrhea.
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 480 mg BID for 5 days.
Patient Illness History (HPI): A 55-year-old African American female patient arrives at the clinic complaining of excruciating stomach discomfort and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Tuesday morning, not long after the patient had woken up, the pain started. After she ate a small dinner, the stomach symptoms grew worse until going away a few hours later. The patient’s abdominal aches stopped on Wednesday morning, although he or she still experienced a little feeling of unease. Up until Saturday, the situation got better before getting worse again. The patient started having terrible pains along with bouts of vomiting and diarrhea.
ts went to space, they simply didn’t arrive on the moon. All things being equal, Armstrong and Aldrin burned through 8 days simply circling the Earth, holding up to return. Trick scholars accept it is in fact difficult to arrive on the moon, and they say for this reason no other nation has attempted it. Most connivance scholars accept that the moon arrival was really created and recorded in the notorious US Air Force office, Area 51. They say that the arrangement of the lunar landing is as yet remaining in the office, which is the reason Area 51 is so vigorously protected. The proof of this? Trick scholars highlight Russian satellite pictures that show cavities that seem to be those on the moon, and a plane shelter that could be utilized as a sound stage.
Close to the above asserts, the principal proof trick scholars mostly depend on irregularities for their proof. They start with the absence of motor commotion in the arrival recordings. Predominant in the take-off recordings, the motor and rockets can’t be plainly heard during the arrival and scheme scholars say you wouldn’t really have the option to hear the space explorers over the motor thunder. They additionally say that the arrival vehicle, the “Hawk” arrived very effectively on the moon. They highlight Armstrong’s test in the desert that was endeavored a couple of months before the arrival. The test was a finished debacle and brought about Armstrong shooting as the vehicle crashed and detonated. Whenever an arrival vehicle was seen was the impeccable arriving on the moon’s surface. As the vehicle arrived on a superficial level that Armstrong depicts “practically like a powder,” scheme scholars say there ought to have been an impact hole made by the blasters in the arrival vehicle. However, in addition to the fact that there is no impact hole found in any photographs or recordings from Armstrong’s arrival, there are no photographs or recordings of a shoot pit in any of the six Apollo missions. Scheme scholars likewise express that as the vehicle makes this hole, (which it didn’t however it ought to have) moon residue ought to have been lifted by the vehicle which ought to then fall onto the feet of the vehicle. However, there is no residue on the feet in the photographs from the arrival. Scheme scholar and self-guaranteed moon landing examiner Bill Kaysing, who recently filled in as a specialist fo