analyze the effectiveness of the strategy to prevent or manage the Hurricane
Katrina natural disaster. Though Katrina occurred almost 15 years ago, it remains important to the Incident
Command System (ICS) because of its enormous impact on people (displacement and death toll) and property.
Specifically, you will write a 5 page paper in which you:
1. Summarize what went wrong and what went well at the local, state, and federal levels.
2. Explain the lessons learned from Hurricane Katrina about the ICS structure and natural disasters.
3. Describe the role the private sector played in the response to and recovery from the disaster.
4. Recommend critical strategies to improve the private sector’s effectiveness in responding to natural
disasters
economy isn’t simply the economy, however only a model of it. Along these lines a PC displaying a psyche (and in this manner giving out all the right reactions by, state, the Turing test) isn’t really a brain, however only a model of one. PCs give models of procedures, however the procedures are not ‘genuine’ (Searle, p.210).
Be that as it may, what is reality? For instance, the eye is essentially a system for getting light and changing it into electrical vitality. The receptors in the eye change it into electrical signs, which are given to the mind. Be that as it may, the eye can be ‘tricked’ into passing on bogus signs – for instance, by method for an optical deception. What we experience is simply an understanding of the electrical signs got by the mind, and in this way not any more genuine than the messages sent to and from a PC program. Searle discusses a PC reproducing the processing of pizza, yet this is certainly not an incredible arrangement diverse to our experience of eating pizza – the taste and warmth are electrical signs and if the taste nerves that movement to the mind were cut, we would have no feeling of taste by any means.
Without a doubt, no one thinks a PC program would really process anything besides the messages to the program say that it does, similarly that the messages to our cerebrums disclose to us an optical deception is accomplishing something it isn’t – the two cases are as ‘genuine’ as one another.
Searle contends that since every single mental marvel are brought about by nerophysiological forms in the cerebrum, along these lines cerebrums cause minds (Axiom 4) and some other framework equipped for causing psyches would must have the causal powers at any rate proportionate to those of minds (Conclusion 2 – Searle, p.210). He contends that running a PC program can’t create the important wonders. Wilkinson concurs, on the grounds that, he says, not all things are calculable. He contends that having abilities or “knowing how” is a piece of human insight which can’t be diminished to “information that” (propositional information), and regardless of how much info it is taken care of, the PC can’t realize what data is pertinent or how to apply it (Wilkinson, p.123).
I differ that this impediment precludes AI in light of the fact that, other than essential instin