Crimes Against Persons; Crimes Against Property; or Crimes Against Society

at
Categories
Tags

 

In at least three (3) pages, identify a category of crime, provide a specific example of the elements of the offense from your state (or state of your choosing) and discuss the investigative approaches and choices that an investigator would most likely consider when conducting an investigation.

In your paper:

(1) identify the category of crime that you will be exploring: Crimes Against Persons; Crimes Against Property; or Crimes Against Society;

(2) identify at least ONE statute from your state (or state of your choice) associated with that crime category and explain the major elements of that offense that need to be investigated and proven;

(3) discuss the type of crime scene you may encounter with that type of offense and how you would handle that crime scene – will it be a large complex scene with many witnesses, lots of physical evidence, or a small scene with no witnesses, etc; OR is this the type of crime that requires special investigation techniques like confidential informants, undercovers, surveillance, etc?

(4) discuss the type(s) of evidence you are likely to be collecting from that scene – is it mostly witness statements, or forensic evidence like DNA, fingerprints, computer evidence, etc – and how you would best handle that evidence;

(5) for the type(s) of evidence you are collecting, what are the potential challenges you may be expected to overcome? Is contamination an issue? What types of witnesses/victims to you potentially come across that would potentially cause reliability issues?

(6) do you think the type of crime you are investigating will likely lead to search warrants? If so, what would you be searching for, where would it be, and what level of evidence do you need to obtain that search warrant?

(7) for the type of investigation you have selected, discuss the clearance rate of offense in general (see reading below) and give an opinion as to if that rate can be improved or not. If you believe it can be improved, explain what additional resources or techniques would lead to improvement. If you do not believe the clearance rate can be improved, give an opinion as to why not.

NOTE: If you chose to discuss Crimes Against Society, discuss what you think the biggest challenge is associated with detecting/investigating the type of offense you selected and what types of additional resources or techniques could lead to more successful investigations of that type of crime.

Sample Solution

The term crimes against the person refers to a broad array of criminal offenses which usually involve bodily harm, the threat of bodily harm, or other actions committed against the will of an individual. Crime against persons means a crime that has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force or other abuse of a person and includes, but not limited to, homicide; assault; kidnapping; false imprisonment; and other sexual offenses. In determining whether a crime falls within this category, the applicable Federal, State, or Tribal law under which the individual was convicted or pleaded guilty or nolo contendere shall be controlling.

systems and strategy; particularly concerning ethnic networks. The actual report remembers seventy proposition of suggestion to handle prejudice for the police force; with the race relations regulation being a significant arrangement to further developing methodology as well as an examination concerning the Metropolitan police force for institutional bigotry and the disappointments in regards to strategy encompassing the Stephen Lawrence case (The Guardian, 1999).

The homicide of eighteen-year-old Stephen Lawrence happened 22nd April 1993 where the young fellow was wounded bringing about his passing; despite the fact that, it was only after January 2012 that two people were seen as at real fault for his homicide (BBC, 2018). The Macpherson report that followed the homicide framed changes by and by this incorporated the “abolishment of the twofold risk rule”; under the steady gaze of this regulation was nullified an individual couldn’t be attempted once more for a wrongdoing they had recently been viewed as not liable for, this was an essential change in strategy as it prompted the conviction of the people saw as at legitimate fault for Stephen Lawrence’s homicide (The Guardian, 2013). This proposes a constructive outcome on policing methodology as cases succeeding the Stephen Lawrence case might have not accomplished a conviction had the twofold risk rule not of been nullified. This is obvious in the ‘Innocent bystanders murder as this adjustment of strategy emphatically affected policing systems as the police had the option to utilize new measurable proof 32 years after the fact to convict the killer of the two youthful casualties (BBC, 2018).

Bowling and Phillips (2002, refered to in Newburn, 2017, p.854) proposed that the proposals that were framed in the Macpherson report drove “to the most broad program of change throughout the entire existence of the connection between the police and ethnic minority networks.” This proposes a beneficial outcome of the Macpherson report as because of a portion of the progressions in strategy and police systems actioned by the suggestions illustrated has implied that the police have started to recapture the trust of ethnic minority networks; which will uphold police practice from here on out.

The 2009 Home Affairs advisory group report composed decade after the Macpherson distribution features if and how the seventy improvement recommendations illustrated in the report had been met at season of distribution; the Home Affairs report featured that Dwayne Brooks proposed a significant region for movement was the “presentation of properly prepared family liason officials in basic episode” (Parliament, 2009). The report features that this vital improvement in police method encompassing suitable preparation for family liason officials to manage basic occurrences has further developed family liason official’s capacity to have the option to ‘keep up with associations with families’, while getting fundamental proof and further developing trust in the police inside the African American population (Parliament, 2009). Subsequently, proposing that this change in policing method and strategy, because of the Macpherson report, has made a positive difference, particularly inside the ethnic co

This question has been answered.

Get Answer