Mindfulness meditation to teach beginning therapists

McCollum, E. E., & Gehart, D. R. (2010). Using mindfulness meditation to teach beginning therapists therapeutic presence: A qualitative study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 36(3), 347-360. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2010.00214.x?casa_token=B5xLokk7JMIAAAAA:CYZKGtpKQJB5z_qHfbH_ilDrq5eYmodW-40GQqIi-yJuHJCt1ycT4x3qTpDiZJvPaukCmGFcN4cnKvxb
The author’s goal is to pinpoint how empathy, compassion, and presence are a few of the more elusive yet crucial elements of the therapeutic process. Both teachers and therapist students find it challenging to teach them. In this study, we explore how studying mindfulness meditation has impacted the development of therapeutic presence in our beginning practicum students. Several themes emerged through thematic analysis of their journal entries, including the benefits of meditation practice, the capacity to be present, balancing being and doing in therapy, and the growth of acceptance and compassion for both themselves and their patients. Our research suggests that adding mindfulness meditation to clinical training might be beneficial.
Thirteen students from our two classrooms who participated in opportunistic sampling permitted us to utilize their weekly journal entries as data for this study. The IRBs at both institutions gave their approval for the study. The weekly journals were a requirement for the course and over the course of the semester, the instructors read them before returning them to the students. Although they were not given a content mark, finishing the diaries was necessary to pass the class. The diaries served as a platform for the students to express themselves, reflect on their experiences, and be held accountable for their weekly practice. Students were encouraged to write in their journals about their experiences with mindfulness meditation and the impact they felt it had on their daily lives and clinical work.
The students talked about a wide range of experiences from practicing mindfulness and how they thought those experiences affected their work as aspiring therapists. The students attributed their capacity to be present as therapists to several “benefits” of their mindfulness practice. They believed that engaging in formal meditation practice made them more relaxed overall and during their therapy sessions in particular. Additionally, they felt it assisted them in becoming more conscious of their internal dialogue and either reducing or disconnecting from it. As a result, they were able to slow their apparent inner tempo or sense of rush by meditating. Finally, several students established boundaries between sessions and when they arrived at their clinical settings by engaging in brief periods of formal practice.
The students’ accounts of their experiences offer at least some proof that practicing mindfulness assisted them in acquiring traits we have dubbed therapeutic presence. This study had several restrictions. For instance, they could only gather information from those students who agreed to give us their notebooks after class. However, as previously mentioned, the specific use of their regular clinical work to ground their descriptions of their encounters lends some weight to the integrity of their reports.

 

Sample Solution

o him. This is further supported by Aristotle’s Politics ((1996), Page 28): ‘a king is the natural superior of his subjects.’ However, he does later emphasise to put all faith in the prince is wrong and has consequences; a thorough examination of the cause of war is required along with the willingness to negotiate rival party (Begby et al (2006b), Page 312& 318). This is supported by the actions of Hitler are deemed unjustly. Also, in today’s world, wars are no longer fought only by states but also non-state actors like Al-Queda and ISIS, showing Vittola’s normative claim on authority is outdated. This is further supported by Frowe’s claim that the leader needs to represent the people’s interests, under legitimate authority, which links on to the fourth condition: Public declaration of war. Agreed with many, there must be an official announcement on a declaration of war (Frowe (2011), Page 59-60&63).
Finally, the most controversial condition is that wars should have a reasonable chance of success. As Vittola reiterated, the aim of war is to establish peace and security; securing the public good. If this can’t be achieved, Frowe argues it would be better to surrender to the enemy. This can be justified because the costs of war would have been bigger (Frowe (2011), Page 56-7).
Consequently, jus ad bellum comprises several conditions but most importantly: just cause and proportionality. This gives people a guide whether it’s lawful to enter a war or not. However, this is only one part of the theory of the just war. Nevertheless, it can be seen above that jus ad bellum can be debated throughout, showing that there is no definitive theory of a just war, as it is normatively theorised.

Jus in bello

The second section begins deciphering jus in bello or what actions can we classify as permissible in just wars (Begby et al (2006b), Page 323).
First, it is never just to intentionally kill innocent people in wars, supported by Vittola’s first proposition. This is widely accepted as ‘all people have a right not to be killed’ and if a soldier does, they have violated that right and lost their right. This is further supported by “non-combatant immunity” (Frowe (2011), Page 151), which leads to the question of combatant qualification mentioned later in the essay. This is

This question has been answered.

Get Answer