The Organizational Profile—Part 1 (IHOP)

at
Categories
Tags

IHOP
Capstone Assignment Overview: Strategy Playbook for Exceptional Results
In this Capstone experience, you will develop a strategy playbook for a selected organization. You may be familiar with the concept of a playbook as it relates
to a sports team, but what might that mean for a business? The Strategy Playbook for Exceptional Results is a roadmap, of sorts, that can help an
organization achieve excellence, respond to challenges, and attain short-term and long-term goals. The organization you choose for this exercise could be an
organization for which you have worked (or hope to work in the future) and for which there is adequate information available to complete all necessary
sections of the playbook. For the Module 1 Assignments, you will begin work on the Strategy Playbook for Exceptional Results that you will build during the 8
weeks of this course. In this playbook, you will draw upon the knowledge and skills you have gained throughout your MBA program to provide your selected
company’s leadership with an analysis of the organization, as well as your recommendations for changes the company could make over the coming years to
improve its organizational performance. The final compilation of your Strategy Playbook for Exceptional Results will be tangible evidence that you can put
your MBA education to use, and it will provide you with a template for how you can help any organization achieve exceptional results.
Important Note: This playbook could be a helpful tool for any organization that is experiencing a problem, either internal or external. Please note that your
selected organization may not be currently experiencing any known issues; however, you could bring to the table certain common issues. For example, your
organization could be experiencing a decline in sales and losing its once abundant target market, or, internally, the organization could be experiencing a high
turnover in the operations department, and the recent climate survey showed a decline in morale throughout the organization. These examples are not allinclusive to an organization, but they may be present in some form. For the purposes of this exercise, you are at liberty to use your creativity to craft an issue
the organization is facing. Be sure to consider the different functional areas, or business units, within the organization to ensure that you are doing a
thorough analysis.
With those thoughts in mind, your task for the final playbook is to use the knowledge and skills you have developed throughout this program to perform an
analysis of the organization (Section 1), assess its readiness for change and improvement (Section 2), and then develop strategic recommendations for how
the organization can overcome its challenges and achieve greater organizational performance (Section 3).
Section 1: The Organizational Profile—Part 1
For the Assignments in this module, you will play the role of a consultant who has been brought in by the CEO of your selected organization to lead a tiger
team. A tiger team is an efficient, highly motivated, and diverse team created to solve or troubleshoot specific major issues facing your organization. The
Assignment will be a building block for the playbook that you will develop as you work through the rest of this course. Your final, synthesized Strategy
Playbook for Exceptional Results is due at the end of Week 8, and it represents what can be thought of as a form of “due diligence analysis,” where you are
stepping into the role of a consultant to a senior leadership team and are preparing a forward-looking, crisp, and impactful evaluation of where you think the
company ought to be going over the next 5 years or so—and how it might get there.
In the Assignments for this module, you will complete Section 1 of your playbook in which you will analyze your selected organization’s culture, social and
economic climate, and overall purpose. This week, you will begin to compile Section 1 of your playbook. Be sure to address the requirements for Part 1, and
include specific examples (where appropriate) and relevant citations from the Learning Resources or from others throughout the program, the Walden
Library, and/or other appropriate academic sources to support your work.
To prepare for this Assignment:
Once you have selected your organization, proceed to the Class Café and respond to the thread labeled “Playbook Organization Selection.” Include in your
post the name of your selected organization as well as the homepage of the organization’s website (if applicable). Please Note: Be sure to select an
organization other than Walmart, Amazon, or Apple.
Download the WMBA 6990 Assignment Template to complete Section 1—Part 1 of your strategy playbook. Note: Be sure to keep a copy of your completed
Assignment this week and in every week of this course as you will be adding to the same file for every playbook Assignment for this course.
By Day 7
Submit your approximately 2-page analysis of the organizational culture, to include the following:
Part 1: Analyzing the Organizational Culture
Classify the current organizational culture of your selected organization, including how ethics, values, diversity, and social responsibility play a role in the
culture. Provide two or more examples to support your response.
Examine the benefits of organizational culture to your company’s position in the market.
Analyze how conditioning and culture could challenge your organization’s strategy.

 

Sample Solution 

Transient memory is the memory for a boost that goes on for a brief time (Carlson, 2001). In reasonable terms visual transient memory is frequently utilized for a relative reason when one can’t thoroughly search in two spots immediately however wish to look at least two prospects. Tuholski and partners allude to momentary memory similar to the attendant handling and stockpiling of data (Tuholski, Engle, and Baylis, 2001). They additionally feature the way that mental capacity can frequently be antagonistically impacted by working memory limit. It means quite a bit to be sure about the typical limit of momentary memory as, without a legitimate comprehension of the flawless cerebrum’s working it is challenging to evaluate whether an individual has a shortage in capacity (Parkin, 1996).

 

This survey frames George Miller’s verifiable perspective on transient memory limit and how it tends to be impacted, prior to bringing the examination state-of-the-art and outlining a determination of approaches to estimating momentary memory limit. The verifiable perspective on momentary memory limit

 

Length of outright judgment

The range of outright judgment is characterized as the breaking point to the precision with which one can distinguish the greatness of a unidimensional boost variable (Miller, 1956), with this cutoff or length generally being around 7 + 2. Mill operator refers to Hayes memory length try as proof for his restricting range. In this members needed to review data read resoundingly to them and results obviously showed that there was a typical maximum restriction of 9 when double things were utilized. This was regardless of the consistent data speculation, which has proposed that the range ought to be long if each introduced thing contained little data (Miller, 1956). The end from Hayes and Pollack’s tests (see figure 1) was that how much data sent expansions in a straight design alongside how much data per unit input (Miller, 1956). Figure 1. Estimations of memory for data wellsprings of various sorts and bit remainders, contrasted with anticipated results for steady data. Results from Hayes (left) and Pollack (right) refered to by (Miller, 1956)

 

Pieces and lumps

Mill operator alludes to a ‘digit’ of data as need might have arisen ‘to settle on a choice between two similarly probable other options’. In this manner a basic either or choice requires the slightest bit of data; with more expected for additional complicated choices, along a twofold pathway (Miller, 1956). Decimal digits are worth 3.3 pieces each, implying that a 7-digit telephone number (what is handily recollected) would include 23 pieces of data. Anyway an evident inconsistency to this is the way that, assuming an English word is worth around 10 pieces and just 23 pieces could be recollected then just 2-3 words could be recalled at any one time, clearly mistaken. The restricting range can all the more likely be figured out concerning the absorption of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the qualification being that a lump is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can differ generally (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option enormous pieces right away, fairly that as each piece turns out to be more recognizable, it tends to be acclimatized

This question has been answered.

Get Answer