“Get Here” by Oleta Adams

at
Categories
Tags

 

Reflection Paper #1

1. Listen to “Get Here” by Oleta Adams (Links to an external site.)
2. Read Exodus Chapter 3 (Links to an external site.)
3. Read Exodus Ch. 14 (Links to an external site.)
4. Read Luke 12:22-35

Directions:

Experiences of Covenant and Appeasement are bound up closely with our images of God. (For example, if my image of God is an exasperated man with a white beard on a throne, then I may have a difficult time imagining God as a source of unconditional love.) Your reading/listening assignment at the beginning of this Module includes three passages from the Bible that present very distinctly different images of God.  As you listen to the  song,  “Get Here”, imagine that the singer is God singing to you.

After considering all  FOUR depictions of the nature of  God, write a brief reflection that includes the following three points:

1. Offer one distinct attribute of God found in EACH ONE  of the three scripture readings. (Be as specific as possible and avoid repeating the same quality a second time .)

2. Describe your feelings and impressions of God based on your experience of listening to the song as an invitation to greater intimacy from God to you. (Consider especially the “hills and mountains” that separate you from a fuller, more peaceful, more meaningful life.)

3. Reflect upon your own image of God and how it compares or contrasts with one or more of the images of God assigned in the Module.

 

Sample Solution

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number

This question has been answered.

Get Answer