Advantages and three disadvantages of using outside consultants in supporting human resources

 

 

What are three advantages and three disadvantages of using outside consultants in supporting human resources in a healthcare organization?

Sample Solution

Using outside consultants to support human resources in a healthcare organization has many advantages and disadvantages that should be taken into account when deciding whether or not this is the right course of action. Three advantages include access to specialized knowledge, improved performance, and cost savings while three disadvantages are lack of accountability, potential misalignment with organizational values, and increased liability.

One major benefit associated with employing external consultants is their ability provide organizations access to specialized knowledge that may not be available within current staff; since these individuals have been trained in particular field they can often offer insight concerning any issues being dealt with helping company find more efficient solutions (Kozlowski et al., 2019). Additionally, consulting services can often lead towards improved performance as third-party assessments help evaluate existing processes from an outsider’s perspective identifying gaps between what is currently being done versus what could theoretically be done better (Kasselmann & Chiappinelli 2018). Finally, incorporating outside assistance does tend reduce costs overall since companies only need pay for services used without having commit extra resources such wages like would normally occur if hiring additional full-time employees (Ramesh et al., 2020).

Conversely though there are also clear drawbacks associated with leveraging consulting firms including difficulty holding them accountable if results aren’t satisfactory or they don’t follow through on promised objectives (Yilmazer & Ferreira 2017). Furthermore external advice may conflict with long held beliefs within organization resulting misaligned standards which can create confusion amongst workers potentially leading decreased productivity levels across board (Brown 2012). Lastly utilizing outsiders increases legal risk because those providing counsel might possess certain qualifications but they do not familiarize themselves completely operations thus leaving room misinterpretations concerning regulations policies etc. resulting higher likelihood liabilities arising due improper actions occurring during consultation period (Mouzans et al., 2014) .

In conclusion, using consultants support human resources departments healthcare organizations can provide personnel access to expertise unavailable internally plus help improve operational efficiency while saving costs at same time. Unfortunately such arrangements require careful consideration because mistakes made by third parties may not always easily rectified opening door for further complications down road.

n a group can alter one’s perception of other individuals, with this effect extending to both ingroup and outgroup members (Hackel, Looser, & Van Bavel, 2014). This includes having a skewed, positive outlook toward one’s ingroup members while inhibiting the extension of empathy and mind perception toward outgroup members (Hackel et al., 2014). Mind perception is the process of attributing a mind to another entity, and is an important mechanism for determining what is not only capable of agency (i.e., taking autonomous actions), but is also capable of feeling emotions, pain, and suffering and thus being afforded empathy (Gray, Gray, & Wegner, 2007).

Group membership can alter one’s perceptions of others in a number of ways. One such way is that membership in a group promotes a positive bias towards members of one’s ingroup over members of an outgroup (Lazerus, Ingbretsen, Stolier, Freeman, & Cikara, 2016; Tanis & Postmes, 2005; Van Bavel, Swencionis, O’Connor, & Cunningham, 2012b; Ziegler & Burger, 2011). Indeed, ingroup membership has been found to promote greater memory for ingroup faces (Van Bavel et al., 2012b). Furthermore, Tanis and Postmes (2005) found that participants afforded greater trust to anonymous individuals when they were told they were ingroup members. Lazerus and colleagues (2016) showed that individuals have a positivity bias when judging the emotional expression of ingroup members that did not emerge for outgroup members. Ziegler and Burger (2011) noted that ingroup membership can alter the amount of cognitive resources afforded to processing individuating information about an ingroup member versus an outgroup member depending on a target’s success (or failure) and the respondent’s mood.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer