Evidence

at
Categories
Tags

 

 

 

Evidence is a crucial part of both the prosecution and the defense. The evidence must be relevant to the case being adjudicated. In addition, evidence cannot stand alone. It may be supported by other evidence, witness statements, victim statements, and the statements of the accused. Considering evidence must never be based on an emotive decision. The evidence must be used to support or refute the claims of both the prosecution and the defense. They must never be based on what the new media reports or what the opinions are of well-known celebrities or politicians. Conclusions can only be considered when the evidence is completely evaluated.

These videos explore various types of evidence and how they are collected. This video explores the collection of physical evidence (MichaelChadBarton, 2009):

Using your reading assignment, the videos above, and what you have learned about evidence, answer the following questions:

Which of the three types of evidence (real, demonstrative, and circumstantial) do you think is the most effective to the outcome of an investigation?
Which of the three types of evidence (real, demonstrative, and circumstantial) do you think would have the most impact on a criminal trial?
Which type of evidence do you think contributes to the elements of a self-defense claim?

Sample Solution

The evidence can help establish an issue of fact by the information they provide. For example an accused person`s fingerprint at the crime scene is some evidence that establishes that they were at that specific location and touched something specific at that location, like a door handle. There are several different types of evidence considered at criminal trial, and they don’t all carry the same weight or importance, it is up to a judge or jury to listen to the evidence and weigh the information and make findings of fact. They are: real evidence, demonstrative evidence, and documentary evidence. Real evidence can usually prove or disprove certain facts in the case. Real evidence also has a lot of weight and is considered more important as it tends to prove certain facts or issues behind a reasonable doubt.

 

 

 

Contrasts Between Conventional and Alternative Medicine

GuidesorSubmit my paper for investigation

AlternativeDoctorThe progress of science is generally accepted to have improved the nature of numerous procedures, items, and administrations. Be that as it may, in specific circles of life, customary strategies are as yet being utilized; medication is a splendid case of the concurrence of two antipodal methodologies. Alongside ordinarily perceived regular medication dependent on science and innovation, there likewise exists elective medication, which once in a while incorporates rehearses created a large number of years back. The predominance of every one of these sorts of medication have a long-standing history, as every one of them have demonstrated its adequacy; thusly, understanding their favorable circumstances and downsides is urgent for framing one’s own perspective.

The main contrast between these two frameworks is their way to deal with analysis. Traditional medication centers around the components that cause sicknesses and helping their manifestations; each variation from the norm is viewed as a free proviso, separate from the character of an individual and their condition. In contrast to its partner, elective medication considers a to be as a harmony of interrelations between a body and its condition; in this way, an ailment is believed to be brought about by a lopsidedness between them. At the end of the day, elective medication centers preferably around purging the whole framework over on restoring its specific components (Buzzle).

This question has been answered.

Get Answer