Work Environment Assessment

Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.
Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)

Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.
Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)

Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.

Sample Solution

The Work Environment Assessment Template I completed for this Module’s Discussion revealed some interesting insights about my workplace. The results suggested that the physical environment of my organization is well maintained as employees have access to resources and amenities which allow them to perform their work efficiently, such as comfortable office furniture, adequate space in both individual offices and collaborative areas, spacious parking lot, cafeteria etc. In addition, employees are provided with opportunities for learning and development; they are encouraged to pursue professional development courses and attend seminars on up-to-date topics.

Two things that surprised me about the results were the lack of recognition given to employees who go above and beyond expectations while performing their duties and the limited flexibility in terms of working hours or vacation policies. Although I believed prior to conducting the assessment that there was a sense of team spirit amongst coworkers due to frequent team building activities, it was confirmed by these findings as our workplace scored highest in regards to peer support amongst colleagues.

The results suggest that overall, my workplace is a healthy and civil environment where employees feel valued by management; however certain aspects can be improved upon such as providing more recognition when appropriate or promoting better communication between different departments so collaboration between teams is more seamless.

angiography is as yet thought to be the highest quality level is on the grounds that it is exact taking into account direct perception of the vasculature. In a concentrate by Remi et al, they contrasted CTPA and pneumonic angiography in patients with intense PE and found that CT gave pictures that were either phenomenal or great based off direct representation of the coagulation. With CTPA, the discoveries of 112 emboli (8 fundamental, 28 lobar, and 76 segmental) matched the consequences of the pneumonic angiography. There were nine examples where block by lymph hubs were confounded as filling surrenders and a situation where a typical CTPA was misjudged as a PE (18). Another investigation discovered that CTPA was uncertain anyplace between 0.9-4.6% of the time (3). In this way, the CTPA has similar exactness at diagnosing intense PEs comparative with aspiratory angiography with the additional advantages of being quicker and more advantageous in the trauma center setting. 6. Guess In patients who are encountering a PE, does a raised D-dimer even out contrasted with a lower D-dimer level increment the 30-day mortality? The utilization of quantitative D-dimer in the work up of patients with pneumonic embolism is questionable as there are numerous things that can erroneously lift the worth bringing about superfluous imaging. Nonetheless, the test is valuable as it has a high responsiveness for distinguishing PEs. One thing that isn’t examined frequently is the utilization of the quantitative D-dimer test for of a prognostic instrument in patients. A concentrate by Dr. Grau took a gander at 588 patients who were encountering indicative PEs and got a quantitative D-dimer estimation on confirmation and were followed for a very long time. They were then placed into three classifications based off the underlying D-dimer esteem: 500-2499 ng/mL, 2500-4999 ng/mL, > 5000ng/mL. The aftereffects of the review showed that patients with D-dimer levels > 5000ng/mL showed higher gamble of death from lethal pneumonic embolism (chances proportion of 4.4) as well as related with more critical sickness. The review showed proof to suggest the D-dimer as a valuable biomarker and supportive in the assurance of beginning treatments (17).

7. Treatment

In patients who have had an intense pneumonic embolism, does the utilization of NOACs for long haul anticoagulation treatment contrasted with vitamin K bad guys give a critical reduction in hemorrhagic occasions?

Whenever patients have been treated for a PE, with heparin or thrombolytics, and are past the intense period of therapy, they should get prophylaxis for a while to forestall the reoccurrence of the PE. Customarily this has been finished with vitamin K adversaries like warfarin. Be that as it may, a ton of exploration is thinking about whether fresher specialists, for example, rivaroxaban, idraparinux (both Element Xa inhibitor) and dabigatran (thrombin inhibitor), are as viable at forestalling intermittent thromboembolic occasions while giving extra advantages like not checking INR, no dietary limitations, and less rate o

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.