Leadership Styles, Character, Behavior, and Traits.

at
Categories
Tags

 

 

 

Instructions

The dilemma of moral leadership vs. ethically responsible behavior raises many questions: Should self-interest come before the interests of others or the greatest good? Can a moral leader be a successful leader? Can leaders ethically manage their “power”? Select two current companies: one that exemplifies moral leadership and the other ethically responsible behavior. Review the cases with the goal to outline the difference between moral leadership vs. ethically responsible behavior.

References

Bass, B.M. (1990). Bass and stogdill’s handbook of leadership (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.

Changingminds.org. Leadership Theories. Retrieved on May 10, 2011 from http://changingminds.org/disciplines/leadership/theories/leadership_theories.htm

Doyle, M. E. and Smith, M. K. (2001). Classical leadership. Retrieved on May 10, 2011 from http://www.infed.org/leadership/traditional_leadership.htm

 

Sample Solution

The dilemma of moral leadership versus ethically responsible behavior is a complex one, with many questions left to interpretation. Should self-interest come before the interests of others or the greatest good? Can a moral leader be a successful leader? Can leaders ethically manage their “power”? To better illustrate the differences between moral leadership and ethically responsible behavior, let us take two current companies for comparison – Apple Inc., which exemplifies moral leadership and Nike Inc., which demonstrates ethical responsibility.

Apple Inc. is an example of a company that has prioritized morality in its decision making process. Its core values revolve around innovation, customer service, integrity and social responsibility (Apple 2020). These principles are translated into concrete actions such as environmental protection initiatives and efforts towards diversity in its workforce (Forbes 2020). In addition to this, Apple has consistently been transparent about its practices by publishing regular reports regarding labor conditions in supplier factories (Lashinsky 2018). This commitment to morality has not only enabled it to establish itself as reliable brand amongst consumers but also allowed it to attract top talent from various backgrounds who share its values.(Crowley 2017)

On the other hand, Nike Inc. prioritizes ethical responsibility over morality when conducting business operations realizing the importance of adapting to changing market trends while remaining true to its identity as an athletic powerhouse (Kumar 2018). The company has recently taken some steps towards sustainability such as introducing more eco-friendly materials for footwear production as well reducing water consumption by 20% since 2011(Nike 2019). Moreover, Nike understands that ethics encompass much more than just environmental protection; it also means being mindful of employee rights through initiatives like equal pay or fair working hours regardless gender or position within organization. This combination of environmentally friendly practices coupled with social conscience have enabled them remain competitive whilst still preserving strong public image.(Anon nd)

Retribution

Love of retribution is unusual. It is incredible, free and visually impaired. What’s more, a ton of fun proceeds. In any case, what happens regularly after affection is something contrary to cherish. At the point when an individual loses love, there is a progression of feelings that they will get. One of the darkest, most grounded and most conspicuous feelings that happen to individuals is vengeance. Pot and The Scarlet Letter are great and old stories dependent on affection, lost love, and vengeance. In The Scarlet Letter, Chillingsworth and Hester should experience passionate feelings for.

In this article we will examine brain science of vengeance. We examine issues identified with characterizing retribution first. I accept there is no reasonable norm to pass judgment on activity as inspiration for retribution. Vengeance is a clarification dependent on the conduct of the recognition trait of the entertainer. Next, we examine the physical, social and mental expenses and advantages related with reprisal. At that point I will check the spread of reprisal. In recognizing revenant want from vengeance, we question the idea of retribution as a programmed or widespread reaction to bad form. We underline the four factors that impact whether misrepresentation casualties pick counter. The tirelessness of outrage, the acknowledgment of cost of vengeance, the social and strict qualities ??of retribution, and the presence of an outer framework that can reestablish equity for casualties.

The awfulness of retribution (now and again called vengeance dramatization, vengeance show or bleeding misfortune) is a sort of hypothesis whose fundamental subject is the lethal aftereffect of vengeance and vengeance. American instructor Ashley H. Thorndiek authoritatively declared the awfulness of vengeance in the 1902 article “Connection among Hamlet and contemporary retribution dramatization”, recorded the advancement of the hero’s retribution plan, and frequently killers and Avengers Brought about his own passing. This sort initially showed up in the early present day British distributed by Thomas Kid’s “Misfortune of Spain” in the last 50% of the sixteenth century. Early works, for example, Jasper Heywood ‘s Seneca (1560’ s), Thomas Norton and Thomas Sackville ‘s play Gorbuduc (1561) were likewise viewed as a misfortune of vengeance. Different misfortunes of popular retribution incorporate the awfulness of William Shakespeare’s Hamlet (1599-1602), Titus Andronics (1588-1593), Thomas Middleton’s Avengers (around 1606).

In this investigation of vengeance and retribution of Elizabeth ‘s retribution, the two plays I see are the “Hamlet” of William Shakespeare and “The Tragedy of Avengers” of Thomas Middleton. After first observing the treatment of the writer ‘s Avengers’ character, different characters in the play will deal with the Avengers. Their fundamental subject is like adhering to the competition, however the two shows present a differentiating picture … Hamlet – a misfortune of vengeance? Shakespeare’s misfortune A secretive arrangement of contemplations identified with retribution of Hamlet makes this article a fascinating encounter. Ruth Nevo clarifies the vulnerability involved by the hero’s most celebrated monolog in Acts 3 and 4 in vengeance. I can not peruse the talk

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer