Briefly define and critique the concept of victim precipitation.
Victim precipitation is a concept used to define situations in which the victim initiates his or her own victimization. When applied to rape, victim- precipitated rape occurs when the victim`s actions are interpreted by the other offender as sexual, thus initiating subsequent behavior (e.g., forcible rape) from the offender. Like all criminology theories, victim precipitation relates to how and why crime happens. While most theories focus on the acts and intentions of the offender, victim precipitation seeks to understand the interaction between the victim and the offender. While there may be a victim-offender duality or dyad that exists in theory, where victims are viewed as always good or virtuous and offenders as always bad on predatory, the reality of crime exists somewhere in the hazy middle.
gion contains a bunch of convictions, sentiments, and practices that show the connection between individuals and their higher power. Every religion has their own given arrangement of standards observed by a local area of devotees. Aside from standards, the adherents could go through rituals and prohibitions while observing regulations from hallowed books separating them from one another. Italy is a socially different nation however it is portrayed by similar to populace with the larger part being Christians and communicating in Italian. The country’s constitution accommodates opportunity of religion. Nonetheless, the nation doesn’t have a state religion. Breaking down the different strict exercises in the Italian history, it is apparent that religion enormously affects the country’s writing, social organizations, training, beneficent exercises, and clothing regulation.
While Roman Catholic Church is broadly perceived as a compelling strict gathering in present day times, its string connection with the early Italian locale didn’t reflect such close ties between the Christian religion and the Italian promontory (Ormieres 307). Christianity was seen as like Judaism, which the Romans viewed as clashing with their own polytheistic convictions. Gaius Suetonius, one of the most notable equestrians of the antiquated roman period, asserted that the Christian religion earned respect during Sovereign Nero’s rule and having ‘naughty’ convictions (Stitching and Nicola 197). In the year 64 Promotion, the Incomparable Fire of Rome exacerbated the enmity that existed between the Romans and other strict gatherings in close to the Realm. The Incomparable Fire prompted mass arraignments of Christians. Christians saw the Greek acts of the Romans as unholy, especially their monism that prevented the center fundaments from getting Christian religion, the idea of paradise.
The weighty abuse of Christians prompted the ascent of theological rationalists who shielded the confidence. Christians were confronting arraignment for more than the Incomparable Fire, with witnesses being utilized as substitutes for diseases and disappointments in harvests. Subsequently, this prompted the rise of Roman nationals who bought into the polytheistic confidence, yet planned to guard the Christians. This was accomplished by placing the precepts of the Christian confidence into philosophical settings that permitted the Romans to identify with Christians. The Christian experiencing started the philosophical discussion on religion which would come full circle in the Incomparable Break. From this underlying battle of the Christian confidence to grab hold in a to a great extent polytheistic district, it is clear that the rule of