Personality of an interviewee or public figure ( J.Cole)

at
Categories
Tags

 

You will write a 4–5-page papers on the personality of an interviewee or public figure of your choice.
Use the paper outline provided on Blackboard, where you describe
The background (who is this person? how did they grow up? what’s their background)
Briefly explain one theory you are using to analyze the person (for example, 5 factor model – describe each factor)
Apply the theory to your person (for example, Kanye is high on extraversion, low on openness, etc.
Briefly explain the second theory you are using (for example, psychoanalytic theory
Apply the theory to the person (for example, Kanye is often driven by his superego because xyz)
Write which theory you think applies best to the person you chose
Reminder: ONE PERSON and TWO THEORIES — you have to write about the SAME person
Paper Format: 4-5 Pages – double spaced, 1-inch margins, APA styleDispositional Theories:

Eysenck’s Model: Extraversion-Intraversion, Neuroticism-emotional stability, Psychoticism
Five Factor Model: Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, Openness (highly recommended) – here’s a helpful article:
Hexaco – Five Factors + Honesty-Humility
Psychoanalytic theories:

Personality structure (Id, Ego, Superego) (highly recommended)
Use of defense mechanisms
Attachment theory
Experiential and Cognitive Theories:

States vs. traits
Affect (positive versus negative)
Hostility
Intelligence/Locus of Control/Self-efficacy

(link provided)
https://www.verywellmind.com/the-big-five-personality-dimensions-2795422

Sample Solution

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number

This question has been answered.

Get Answer