Read the Equifax’s Data Breach (attached). Then, answer the following four questions:
1. Do you think the company reacted appropriately upon learning about the breach? Why why not?
2. What type(s) of ethical climate existed at Equifax, and did this contribute to the hacking issues there?
3. What changes should managers and the board of directors make now to reduce the likelihood of an incident like this from occurring in the future?
4. What types of ethics training would you recommend for Equifax employees in the future to prevent such corrupt behavior?
In response to Equifax\’s data breach, I do not believe that the company reacted appropriately upon learning about it. This is because they waited six weeks before informing customers about the hack and in some cases did not provide sufficient compensation for affected parties (Kesavan et al 2018). Furthermore, the way in which they communicated the issue was also criticized – with many feeling that their statements were confusing and lacking in transparency (Paganini 2019).
The type of ethical climate at Equifax prior to the attack could be classified as ‘defensive’ – meaning compliance with regulations was prioritized over individual integrity or social responsibility. This can be attributed largely to a lack of strong leadership from senior executives who failed to emphasize ethical behavior or actively promote corporate values within their organization (Hershey & Dachler 2017). It is possible therefore that this contributed to hacking issues at Equifax as employees may have been less likely to challenge unethical practices or report any suspicious activities.
His translation is by his own comprehension and not of the real mainland. Would Asia find his portrayal of a female holding a lotus blossom, with a tiger a lovely meaning of their whole landmass. Will Africa see his truly intending that out of the relative multitude of sculptures their female portrayal is topless and seems resting. The area of every sculpture seems to characterize how every landmass was seen, is this because of how Americans saw themselves including what might seem their European accomplices. Europe’s sculptures appears of sovereignty when the area of these figures are situated in a recreation area which was once owed by the very Ruler that America battled to acquire it’s opportunity and who vandalized by eliminating the crowns off the wall which are as yet seen today. At long last we have America who stands conspicuously prepared to participate in any fight as what might turn into America’s genuine position, prepared immediately. Obviously America, it’s specialty and individuals perceived themselves as the one genuine prevalence and every other person was sub-par.
Suggestion: (Remain, Eliminate, Re-contextualize)
The sculptures can stay with one besides of re-contexualizing the model decided to address America. In the event that we decide to keep the sculpture the way things are, there ought to be a plaque introduced to add more verifiable setting of America’s contribution and treatment of Local Americans. I recommend an upgrade evacuation of the whole Public Exhibition hall of Native American. Local American in the present society shouldn’t need to visit a site that addresses a verifiable piece of their reality and American history and feel distressed gazing upward and see Christophe Columbus. All the more critically one adaptation has proactively been systematized for a really long time enhanced by the activities in trustworthy of racial prevalence, it is far time for more extra happy zeroing in on the relational part of Local American history, culture and experience told proudly notwithstanding the convoluted organization previously worked inside the Joins States.
Experience and Bits of knowledge (utilizing the scientif