Sample Solution

Albert Bandura’s Theory of Self-Efficacy is a widely accepted psychological concept in which individuals are believed to be able to develop their own sense of belief and achievement through experiences, observation, encouragement and beliefs (Bandura, 1977). The theory has been widely applied to various fields such as education, psychology, health and sports. Its main principle is that individuals form beliefs about the skills they possess based on their past experience and environment. This can then motivate them either positively or negatively to engage in certain activities.

The Internal Criticism process assesses how well the theory can explain a given phenomenon (Creswell, 2018). Applying this evaluation technique to Bandura’s Theory of Self-Efficacy gives us insight into its robustness and applicability in research. Firstly, Bandura’s theory provides a comprehensive explanation for how self-efficacy forms by looking at four major factors: performance accomplishments, vicarious learning from role models/peers, verbal persuasion from others and emotional states from feelings of anxiety or depression (Bandura et al., 1977). These individual components work together in different combinations depending on the situation being observed resulting in an accurate description of behavior change over time. Secondly, unlike other theories on self-efficacy such as cognitive views which focus solely on internal thought processes or external influences like environmental cues; this model incorporates both aspects creating an effective balance between internal drives and external influences when examining human behavior patterns.

When it comes to External Criticism evaluation however there are certain limitations with respect to Bandura’s Theory that need to be noted before adapting it for use in research. For instance while it explains why people do things it doesn’t necessarily provide details regarding how they should go about achieving those objectives making it difficult for researchers trying to create specific interventions aimed at changing behaviors (Zimmerman & Schunk 2011). Additionally, since self-efficacy relies heavily on personal experience there could be instances where what works for one person may not necessarily have the same effect when implemented somewhere else due cultural differences or lack of resources etc.; thus making it hard for researchers using this approach would face difficulty generalizing findings across multiple contexts(Funk et al., 2004).

In conclusion, although Bandura’s Theory allows us better understand our motivations behind behaviors; caution must still be taken when attempting to apply its principles within research studies especially if you wish your results will be applicable beyond the case study itself.