Sample Solution
Jealousy is a powerful emotion that can consume and control those who feel it. In William Shakespeare’s play, Othello, jealousy is a major theme which plays a key role in the protagonist’s downfall. It is first seen when Iago manipulates Othello into believing his wife Desdemona has been unfaithful with Cassio thus sparking fit of rage within Moor (Shakespeare 2016). This same motif reoccurs throughout the story with Iago preying upon Othello’s insecurities planting seeds of doubt leading him to make rash decisions, ultimately condemning himself to his demise (Levin 2014).
The consequences of this emotion are devastating as it leads to tragedy after Othello takes life not only his own but also those closest to him, such as his beloved Desdemona, whom he mistakenly believes betrayed him (Frye 1984). Jealousy therefore serves a lesson about the dangers unchecked passion can have on relationships if left untreated, causing individuals to act out of impulse rather than reason; so caution must always be exercised even when surrounded with love and trust (Voskuilen 2011).
To conclude, jealousy plays a pivotal role in Shakespeare’s famous work, demonstrating how destructive it can become if left unchecked. Whether one blames Iago for taking advantage of the situation or victim of their own emotions, blame cannot be put solely on any single individual since no one acts alone; emotions involved could potentially lead anyone astray if proper measures aren’t taken to ensure clarity within relationships before actions are taken.
The theme of jealousy is a pervasive one in Shakespeare’s play Othello, and it is represented in a variety of different ways. From Iago’s envy towards Othello to Desdemona’s loyalty to her husband, jealousy can be seen as a motivating factor for many of the characters’ actions. In particular, Othello’s struggle with his own jealous suspicions of Desdemona’s faithfulness leads him down a destructive path that ultimately ends in tragedy.
Jealousy is first introduced through Iago’s soliloquies where he expresses his dissatisfaction with being passed over for promotion by Othello and his resentment towards Cassio; this serves as the impetus for Iago’s villainous plot against both men. His manipulations also lead to planting seeds of doubt into Othello’s mind regarding Desdemona which causes him to become increasingly consumed with jealousy. This distrust eventually drives a wedge between them, leading to disastrous consequences.
By and large, “”In old Greece and Rome, before the approaching of Christianity, perspectives toward child murder, dynamic willful extermination, and self destruction had would in general be lenient. Numerous old Greeks and Romans had no fittingly characterized confidence in the intrinsic worth of individual human existence, and agnostic doctors probably performed regular early terminations as well as both deliberate and compulsory benevolence killings. Albeit the Hippocratic Vow restricted specialists from giving ‘a dangerous medication to anyone, not regardless of whether requested,’ or from recommending such a game-plan, barely any old Greek or Roman doctors followed the pledge steadfastly. All through old style relic, there was broad help for deliberate demise rather than delayed anguish, and doctors agreed by frequently giving their patients the toxins they mentioned.” (Dowbiggin) Despite the fact that doctors in old times made a similar vow to save lives, they actually gave out toxins to kill patients. Some say that the justification behind the doctors’ activities were on the grounds that Christianity hadn’t been laid out yet. Thus, the rule of “Thall will not kill,” had not yet been composed.
“Since old times, Jewish and Christian scholars have gone against self destruction as conflicting with the human great and with obligations to God. In the thirteenth hundred years, Thomas Aquinas embraced Catholic showing self destruction in contentions that would impact Christian idea about self destruction for quite a long time. Aquinas denounced self destruction as off-base since it contradicts one’s obligation to oneself and the regular tendency of self-propagation; since it harms others and the local area of which the individual is a section; and in light of the fact that it disregards God’s power over life, which is God’s gift. This position exemplified perspectives about self destruction that won from the Medieval times through the Renaissance and Reconstruction.” (ProCon.org) Despite the fact that the discussion is normally about doctor helped self destruction, the truth of the matter is that the patients are as yet commiting self destruction. In the event that an individual who is of sound psyche and can simply decide, in the event that they are introducing self-destructive considerations, policing each option to mediate the endeavor. On the off chance that that is the situation with regular individuals, for what reason would it be advisable for it be any unique for individuals who are wiped out and in the clinic. Assuming that equivalent individual who was wiped out was out on the planet, and came dependent upon somebody and requested that that individual assist with committing suicide since they essentially don’t have any desire to live any longer, the individual likely wouldn’t help them.
During the late eighteenth Hundred years, “The dismissal of self destruction and willful extermination stayed firm, even after large numbers of the new states decriminalized self destruction following the Progressive Conflict. Most of Americans dismissed self destruction’s precedent-based regulation discipline… yet regardless of how thoughtful they were toward the self destruction’s family, most Americans halted far shy of excusing self-murder. As late as the before the war period there existed in the US a firm agreement… against self destruction and benevolence killing.” (Dowbiggin)
In 1999, a case is Michigan sentenced Jack Kevorkian, MD, of homicide. He was the essential ca
