Dred Scott v. Sanford

at
Categories
Tags


A. Introduction:

1. Identify the name of the case and when it was heard before SCOTUS.

2. Identify the parties involved in the case.

3. Briefly describe the focus of the case.

B. Describe the case itself: What was the controversy in the case?

C. How did the case move through the courts before reaching SCOTUS?

1. What court had original jurisdiction in the case?

2. How had previous courts ruled in the case?

D. What did the SCOTUS rule in the case?

1. What was the argument of the majority opinion?

2. What was the argument of the minority opinion?

E. What was the reasoning used by the SCOTUS to reach its decision? How did it reach its decision?

E. Conclusion: How does the Court’s ruling in the case affect Americans today?

1. Has the Court’s ruling in the case affected other rulings in other cases?

2. Has the Court’s ruling affected the interpretation and enforcement of any particular laws, and how those laws are enforced?


3. If applicable: Has the Court’s ruling in this case affected you, or someone you know, personally?

Sample Answer

Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) was a landmark case taken before the supreme court of USA for the court to apply its judicial mind on the question of human rights with regard to Americans of African origin, whether free or slaves. Among other things, the court argued that black Americans were not Americans in the strict sense of the word and therefore lacked the needed ‘locus standi’

So as to show the impacts that slaughter has on the general soundness of a country, I have part this section into 3 subchapters: emotional wellness, physical wellbeing, and social wellbeing. This gives to be useful as it gives a top to bottom investigate various fields that all comprise to a countries general wellbeing.

Effect on Mental Health

WHO characterizes psychological wellness as "a condition of prosperity wherein each individual understands their own potential, can adapt to the typical worries of life, can work beneficially and productively, and can make a commitment to her or his locale". Mental clutters, then again, are a very expansive term and portrayed by a mix of upset contemplations, feelings, conduct and associations with others. This incorporates nervousness, misery, schizophrenia, and substance misuse. (Kessler et. al 2009: 23ff)

There have been a few investigations that have been led on the effect of massacre on emotional well-being. Since 1980 there has been a keeps on expanding in look into one on the psychological wellness of those influenced by slaughter bringing about uncovering that individuals influenced by political savagery are bound to meet the criteria for psychopathology meaning: gloom, uneasiness, and PTSD. (Lindert 2012: 168) This can be added to the horrible accidents the populace experiences in destruction. They face, for instance, the accompanying: relatives being murdered, relatives biting the dust from infection, companions being executed, family members or companions vanishing, being isolated from their families, constrained departure, pulverization of homes, ranches, neighborhoods, schools and houses of worship, wounds, physical attack, need to cover up for significant stretches, starvation, double-crossing by neighbors or companions. (Steward 2015: 7) Entire family frameworks, just as social emotionally supportive networks which once in the past offered help, were demolished not just because of the loss of relatives yet additionally in view of the developing doubt among the populaces (Rieder, Elbert 2013: 2) which means dwelling together was significantly influenced. (Buckley-Zistel 2006: 131) Hence influencing the emotional well-being as well as the social wellbeing of the individuals, as I will additionally expand on later.

In Rieder and Elbert's (2013) learn about the psychological wellness of the survivor

This question has been answered.

Get Answer