Social media platforms

 

Search and select two articles that address one ethical or policy issue regarding social media platforms or social media marketing’s use of platforms. Use credible journalism sources such as business
You will briefly summarize the issue being discussed in the two articles, provide a critique of the points made in these articles and write your reaction in approximately a 2-page summary (double-spaced, 1” margins, 12-pitch font, 500 – 600 words,).
What is the policy or social issue being discussed in the 2 articles? How is the issue relevant to marketing?
Identify each author’s purpose and intent of their respective articles. Clarify whether the two articles provide different points-of-view, identify a different or the same cause or root of the issue. What possible solution or change does each author recommend? Do they provide similar or varying recommended solutions. Describe for each briefly.
Critique the articles: evaluate the value of each article stating whether you agree or disagree with the author, using supporting evidence.
Do they each both provide valid points of concern, or viable solutions to the problem or issue? What might you recommend that is aligned with their views or that offers a different solution?

 

 

Sample Solution

The two articles I chose address the ethical and policy issue of data privacy in relation to social media platforms. The first article is “Data Privacy: What You Need To Know Before Posting On Social Media” by Forbes, which talks about how users need to be aware of their digital footprint when using social media and that companies are collecting user data from multiple sources. It warns users to take caution when it comes to providing personal information on social networks, as this could lead to identity theft or other malicious activities.

The second article is “How Can We Enhance Data Privacy on Social Media Platforms?” by Harvard Business Review, which explores the idea of creating effective regulation for protecting user data and encouraging transparency from tech companies. It suggests implementing stronger measures such as ensuring consent forms are clear and robust in order for users understand what information they are giving away when signing up for a platform or using its services.

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number

This question has been answered.

Get Answer