The essay is based on the feed back. You will need to make up three feedback in the six activities of
workshop slides. The details can be found in assessment handbook
1. Pick three out of six activities that run from Week 2 to Week 7 to reflect upon;
2. Incorporate theories and concepts that you have learned so far from the workshops to critically analyse
the dynamics of your Study Team;
You are NOT required to discuss all of the workshop topics. It is suggested that you only draw on those
topics that you find most relevant to your personal reflection.
3. Evaluate yourself as a team member (i.e., any strengths and weaknesses that you can identify?); and
4. Conclude your reflection by drawing out key lessons learned from the experience of having worked with
your Study Team
This can be considered as your conclusion section
The topic also can found in assessment hand book
the three activities feedback are also need to based on the 204 reflective question.docx
Preferred language style Simple (Easy vocabulary, simple grammar constructions)
Initially, Creon has an unshaken steadfastness to his state while Antigone has an undying pledge to her family’s prosperity, religion and eventually her soul. These characters are the starting points of enlivened discussions among the devotees of the play on who ought to get more compassion than the other basing on the disastrous encounters that they experience in the whole story. Consequently, this paper gives an extensive conversation on my decision of the character that gets a greater amount of my compassion than the other by basically investigating and portraying their character qualities as dependent on the sad storyline that the play has.
Conversation
The character characteristics radiated by Creon, as I would like to think, are packed with glitches. Creon portrays a progression of glitches through his character combined with tremendous pride that drives him to the various experiences that he experienced. He settles on unreasonable choices without speculation wisely and in prudence. He doesn’t counsel others to use their astute exhortation and rather settles on his own choices that land him in various difficulties. Creon shows his pride by being simply the lord unrivaled and furthermore pounding as a better being than the town women. For example, Sophocles et. Al (18) gives the proof that the judgment of Antigone to pass on was made a huge deal about for the sole explanation that Antigone was undermining a man as opposed to the real explanation that she ignored him. Additionally, Sophocles et. Al (20) approves the male prevalence that Creon utilizes unjustifiably over abuse ladies when he marks his child Haemon of being a “lady’s slave” since Thebes’ kin were identifying with Antigone for experiencing the various trials. In any case, what causes me to feel for him is the way that he regards counsel from Chorus, which is clearly some valuable data. He fears for his life on the grounds that the Theban ruler could rebuff him, which shows that he gulped his tremendous pride and tuned in to someone else (Sophocles and Carson 8). Be that as it may, a definitive issue that curbs his pride is the end of his child and dear spouse, where his pride totally vanishes. Johnson (25) demonstrates that in the long run, he concedes that he wasn’t right that he didn’t notice any individual’s recommendation, which caused him to repeat a large portion of the grave slip-ups that he did. These occasions are obviously heart-dissolving, and they caused me to feel for him not at all like toward the start of the whole story when he was executing different outrages cruelly.