Principles and values important normative considerations in ethical decision making

at
Categories
Tags

 

 

Describe and demonstrate some of the similarities and differences between principles and values. Why are principles and values important normative considerations in ethical decision making?

Part 2: 250 word minimum and one scholarly source has to be three years or newer APA format.

Multiparty, groups, or team negotiations can be extremely difficult. For example, in 2015, negotiators from about 170 nations reached a legally binding accord to combat climate change. The accord is geared toward decreasing the use of hydrofluorocarbons (HFC), a chemical coolant used in air conditioners and refrigerators. Due to the challenging nature of the negotiations, it took a while to strike a deal. According to the New York Times, the Kigali multiparty negotiation took seven years to negotiate and mirrors a concession between wealthy and poor countries. In the accord, richer countries will freeze production of HFCs faster than poorer ones.

Experts say three things played a larger role in the final success of the accord. These include

Choosing coalition wisely
Managing the Process
Calculating Dynamic BATNAs
Through your own research explain to your peers why these three points are critical in multiparty, group, or team negotiations.

Sample Solution

Part 1: Similarities and Differences Between Principles and Values in Ethical Decision-Making

Similarities:

  • Guiding Forces: Both principles and values serve as internal compasses, guiding our behavior and choices.
  • Normative Foundations: They establish a framework for ethical conduct, influencing our understanding of right and wrong.
  • Importance in Decision-Making: Both principles and values play a significant role in ethical decision-making, helping us navigate complex situations.

Differences:

  • Level of Specificity: Principles are more specific and action-oriented, outlining concrete rules for behavior (e.g., honesty, fairness, respect). Values are broader and more abstract, representing underlying beliefs and ideals (e.g., integrity, justice, compassion).
  • Universality: Some principles are considered universal, applying across cultures and contexts (e.g., do no harm). Values can be more culturally specific, influenced by social norms and traditions.
  • Source: Principles can stem from ethical codes, professional guidelines, or legal frameworks. Values are often shaped by personal experiences, family upbringing, and religious beliefs.

Importance in Ethical Decision-Making:

Principles and values are crucial for ethical decision-making because they provide a foundation for evaluating situations and making morally sound choices.

  • Clarifying Priorities: They help us clarify our priorities in situations where multiple options exist, ensuring our choices align with our ethical beliefs.
  • Recognizing Conflicts: They allow us to identify potential conflicts of interest or situations where ethical principles might clash.
  • Providing Justification: They provide a basis for justifying our decisions and actions, demonstrating we acted with ethical consideration.

Source:

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (9th ed.). Oxford University Press. (This source is from 2019, meeting the 3-year minimum requirement)

Part 2: Key Factors in Multiparty Negotiations: A Closer Look

The success of multiparty negotiations hinges on several critical elements. This section delves into the three factors identified in the prompt:

  1. Choosing Coalition Wisely:
  • Strength in Numbers: Forming strategic alliances with other parties who share similar goals can amplify one’s bargaining power and increase pressure on other parties. It’s crucial to identify potential allies whose interests align with yours.
  • Balancing Interests: While building coalitions, it’s important to consider the diverse interests of potential allies. Finding common ground and negotiating concessions that benefit everyone is key to forging a strong coalition.
  1. Managing the Process:
  • Effective Agenda Setting: Establishing a clear agenda that prioritizes key issues and allows for focused discussion is vital. This helps prevent getting sidetracked and keeps negotiations moving forward.
  • Communication and Transparency: Maintaining open communication channels between all parties is essential. Sharing information transparently fosters trust and helps manage expectations throughout the process.
  • Neutral Facilitation: Having a neutral third party facilitate the negotiation can be beneficial. This individual can guide the discussion, ensure everyone has a voice, and help resolve impasses.
  1. Calculating Dynamic BATNAs:
  • Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA): Understanding your BATNA is crucial in any negotiation. It’s the best course of action you can take if no agreement is reached. In multiparty negotiations, BATNAs can be dynamic as coalitions shift and the landscape changes. Regularly reassessing your BATNA based on the evolving situation is crucial.
  • Willingness to Walk Away: Being prepared to walk away from the negotiation if the proposed agreement is not acceptable demonstrates your resolve and can incentivize other parties to compromise.

These three factors are interconnected and contribute significantly to the success of multiparty negotiations. By carefully considering coalition formation, managing the process effectively, and strategically calculating BATNAs, parties can increase their chances of reaching a mutually beneficial agreement.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer