Our textbook, Effective Training… explains that needs analysis can be proactive (planned in advance for an expected future performance gap) or reactive (conducted here and now to address an immediate, current performance gap).
Provide an example of a situation (either a real past experience or a hypothetical) in which you would recommend either a proactive or a reactive needs analysis (pick one). Describe the situation and explain why you believe the type of needs analysis you chose would be most practical. What would the outcome be if no needs analysis was conducted?
Proactive Needs Analysis: Implementing a New Customer Relationship Management (CRM) System
Scenario:
Our company is experiencing significant growth, and our current customer service system is becoming overloaded. We are constantly struggling to meet customer response times and provide a personalized experience. To address this growing issue, we are planning to implement a new, more robust Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system in six months.
Why Proactive Needs Analysis?
In this situation, a proactive needs analysis is the most practical approach. Here’s why:
Outcomes of No Needs Analysis:
If we didn’t conduct a needs analysis, we could face several negative consequences:
By taking a proactive approach and conducting a needs analysis before implementing the new CRM system, we can ensure a successful transition and maximize the benefits for both our employees and our customers.