Summative Assessment: Assessing Product Safety
Your organization has made it a priority that safety is taken into consideration when making clinical decisions. There is an opportunity to find an informatics or technology solution to improve the safety and overall well-being of patients.
Select an information technology you believe will benefit your organization. If your organization is currently using a similar product, you will compare the new technology to the one being used right now. For example, you have selected Epic for the electronic health record because your organization is currently using Meditech, which is outdated. In this case, you will compare Epic to Meditech.
If you have selected a technology your organization is not currently using, you will need to locate another one that is commercially equivalent to the one you selected. For example, your organization does not use integrated vital sign machines but you believe they will provide a significant benefit to the organization and you have selected Philips. You will need to locate another integrated vital sign machine, such as Vital Link to compare to.
Determine what 5 criteria are most important for evaluating the product, safety being foremost. Other possible criteria might be ease of use, clarity, time, etc.
Examine the 2 products and compare and contrast their strengths and weaknesses.
Evaluate the 2 products using the 5 criteria you determined to be the most important.
Create a 15- to 20-slide presentation with detailed speaker notes in which you:
o Provide a detailed description of the 2 products and include your rationale for selecting one brand over the others.
o Explain how the selected products could mitigate the administrative or clinical problem.
o Present the result of your product evaluation. Your product evaluation should answer the following required questions:
o What are the strengths and weaknesses of each product?
o How does each product compare when assessed on the 5 criteria you determined to be most important?
o What clinical outcomes are associated with each product? Is there evidence to support that the product is effective and safe?
o Will the product integrate easily with your hospital’s existing systems?
Summative Assessment: Assessing Product Safety – Improving Medication Administration with Technology
Introduction
Speaker Notes In today’s healthcare environment, patient safety is paramount. Medication errors are a significant concern, and our organization is committed to finding technological solutions to improve safety and patient well-being. This presentation will explore two information technologies: Bard Medication Management System (BMMS) and Meditech Expanse Medication Administration module. We will compare and contrast these products based on five key criteria, ultimately recommending the most suitable solution for our organization.
The Problem: Medication Errors
Speaker Notes Medication errors pose a serious threat to patient safety. These errors can happen at any point in the medication administration process, from prescribing to dispensing to administering the medication. The consequences of such errors can vary in severity, but can even be fatal. Our goal is to implement a technology that minimizes such risks.
Introducing Bard Medication Management System (BMMS)
Speaker Notes Bard Medication Management System (BMMS) is a cloud-based solution that aims to improve medication administration efficiency and safety. Its core functionalities include electronic prescribing, computerized physician order entry, barcode medication administration, drug-drug interaction alerts, and real-time documentation.
Introducing Meditech Expanse Medication Administration
Speaker Notes Meditech Expanse Medication Administration is a medication management module integrated within the Meditech Expanse EHR system. It offers functionalities like CPOE with basic drug interaction checks, barcode medication scanning, and medication administration documentation.
Evaluation Criteria
Speaker Notes To effectively compare these two products, we will assess them based on five key criteria. Safety, weighted at 30%, is the most crucial factor as it directly impacts patient well-being. Ease of use (20%) is vital for staff adoption and efficient workflow. Integration (20%) ensures compatibility with our existing systems to minimize disruption. Cost (15%) is a significant consideration, and scalability (15%) ensures the solution can adapt to our future needs.
Product Evaluation: Safety