Develop a 4–5 page examination of your chosen healthcare issue within the context or your chosen country.
Introduction
Note: The assessments in this course build upon each other, so you are strongly encouraged to complete them in sequence.
The manner in which policymakers allocate and promote resources has a strong relationship to access to healthcare, positive health outcomes, and life expectancy.
The past century has been marked by the second industrial revolution, economic development, human development, and the green revolution. These developments have contributed to improved standards of living but often created new threats to low-income countries through environmental degradation. Improved nutrition and basic infrastructure have helped many societies to experience an epidemiological transition, a decrease in infectious diseases, and increased life expectancy.
Global health organizations are trying to address healthcare issues of all kinds throughout the world. Guiding principles are set by the World Health Organization (WHO), and goals for improving global health policy have been defined by its millennium development goals. Other major worldwide organizations such as the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, and others will continue to shape and mold global health policy.
From an international perspective, money and wealth do not necessarily buy positive health outcomes. The manner in which policymakers allocate and promote resources bears a strong relationship to access to healthcare, positive health outcomes, and life expectancy. China and Kerala, India, are prime examples of growth-mediated and support-led models. Service delivery, healthcare funding, prevention, and life expectancy are impacted by resource allocation. Elements and best practices can be extrapolated from the growth-mediated models and support-led models to compare with specific low, middle, and high income countries.
As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.
Which type of healthcare system (entrepreneurial, mandated health insurance, or national health service) is most closely aligned to WHO principles?
What are the strengths and weaknesses of each type of healthcare system?
How would you measure an organization’s success against other organizations that are trying to address the same issues? Consider qualitative and quantitative measures.
Note: The country and healthcare issue you choose for this assessment will form the basis of each of the three assessments in this course.
Preparation:
Complete the following:
Choose one of the global healthcare issues listed below. Consider choosing an issue that is of interest or relevance to your career.
Choose a country to study, which has identified one of the issues below as a central problem facing its population. Be sure that you have reasonable access to this country’s healthcare information.
Consult your textbook, the Capella University Library, and the Internet to analyze the ways your chosen country delivers healthcare to its population.
You may wish to review Health Care Administration Master’s Program (MHA) Library Guide.
View the World Health Care Types infographic activity in this assessment.
Reflect on your critical thinking.
Global Health Care Issues
Consider the following global healthcare issues:
Infant and children’s mortality.
Mental health.
Substance abuse.
Infectious diseases (cholera, AIDS, malaria, flu, et cetera).
Noninfectious diseases (cardiovascular, stroke, diabetes, et cetera).
Maternal and reproductive health.
Malnutrition.
Domestic violence.
Deliverable
Write a 4–5-page examination of your chosen healthcare issue within the context or your chosen country.
Determine if the country and healthcare type you chose is a progressive system, a regressive system, or a proportionate system.
Select one of the following areas to examine:
Affordability and funding.
Patient access and equity.
Education programs.
Prevention programs.
Service provisioning (delivery).
Healthcare work force.
Monitoring of the disease.
Complete the following in reference to your chosen areas:
Summarize the needs of healthcare consumers associated with the issue.
Identify the funding amounts and sources dedicated to this issue in the country.
Analyze governmental approaches to address the issue.
Discuss the gaps between the needs of consumers and services offered by the government.
Describe briefly other providers (private or nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) that support, augment, or substitute government efforts.
In answering the assessment, include an analysis of your critical thinking:
How do my life experiences influence my perspective?
South Africa, a country rich in cultural diversity and economic potential, faces a formidable public health challenge in the form of the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Despite significant strides since the early 2000s, HIV/AIDS continues to be a major contributor to morbidity and mortality, placing immense strain on the nation’s healthcare system. The country’s history of apartheid has left a legacy of deep-seated socioeconomic inequalities that directly influence health outcomes, making the fight against infectious diseases a complex issue of both medical and social policy.
South Africa’s healthcare system is a mix of public and private sectors, with a strong commitment to addressing inequalities, aligning it more with a progressive system in its stated goals, though its implementation faces challenges. A progressive system is one where the proportion of income paid in taxes or contributions for healthcare increases as income increases. South Africa’s system, through its taxation-funded public sector, aims to provide universal access to a basic level of care, though the quality and access in the public sector are often strained, leading those who can afford it to opt for the well-resourced private sector. This creates a dual system that, in practice, can be regressive for the poor, as they bear the burden of a less-effective public system.
I will examine patient access and equity concerning HIV/AIDS in South Africa.
The needs of healthcare consumers with HIV/AIDS in South Africa are multifaceted. Beyond basic medical care, they require:
The funding for South Africa’s HIV/AIDS response is a blend of domestic and international sources. The government is the largest funder, allocating a significant portion of the national health budget to the National Strategic Plan for HIV, TB, and STIs. However, international donors, such as the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, provide substantial financial and technical support, especially for ART procurement and service delivery.
The South African government has adopted a proactive and comprehensive approach to addressing HIV/AIDS, particularly under the leadership of the National Department of Health. Key strategies include:
Despite significant governmental efforts, there are notable gaps between consumer needs and the services offered.
Other Providers: Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and private providers play a crucial role in filling these gaps.