1. Choose one of the following approaches (context, system, component of society) to family nursing. (a) generate a family reflective of the assigned approach. (Describe what this family will look like to the nurse.) (b) Then identify health care settings, family circumstances, and nurse resources that are appropriate for use by the nurse who is working with the family. (c) Will family arrangement or structure affect how the nurse works with the family or the nurse resources used to work with the family?
2. Discuss how factors relating to biological and age-related risks, environmental risks, and behavioral risks contribute to family health and the achievement of healthy outcomes. Discuss activities that the nurse practicing in the community can implement to assist families to decrease health risks.
3. Choose an environmental health issue or concern in your community. Thoroughly review the hazard, including its effect on people, the interventions that could or should take place, and the role that nurses should play in reducing or eliminating this hazard. Submit your findings in a discussion.
An Ethics of Reading
At nine years old, Edith Wharton created typhoid fever. A neighborhood specialist told his folks that he was unable to do anything, and their little girl would bite the dust soon. Just the server of the other specialist just went through the town, and checked the young lady gently and spared her life. She got a fever and her young Wharton started to recoup. During recuperation, she promptly ravenously. One of the books she gave contains a “powerful” story – this story is end up being “perilous perusing” by Wharton’s own words (Wharton, p. 275).
While thinking about moral perusing, it is important to recognize perusing morals from understanding morals. For me, perusing morals incorporates perceiving what our identity is and what our biases and interests are. Understanding morals, despite the fact that regardless of how magnificent it is, doesn’t give an answer for read Daniel’s predictions on the divider however gives a few prospects. A sympathetic method to enter perusing for individuals with various positions. For me, the morals of perusing mentions to me what the creator told his unique fanciful crowd, why and how the genuine staggered crowd will react, and why that reason I will. The ethical standpoint in perusing is identified with understanding morals, in contrast to worries about worth – arranged epistemology.
I as of late read a questionable paper called “Vast Ethics” on Nick Bostrom. Perusing his work, I decipher unbounded morals as vast morals. Inquiries regarding rights and mistakes, and how they work in a limited and vast range. Scratch Bostrom’s paper quickly portrays boundless positive and negative universes. Unbounded qualities can not be changed by including or taking away limited qualities. It bodes well for me. We can take a gander at the stars around evening time, we can not change the tremendous sea and the encompassing mountains – these godlike gigantic things alone. These are the excellent things we found during childbirth, and we once in a while passed on. It can not be changed. Be that as it may, – they can
However, I am as yet discouraged. Aristotle’s Nicomachean morals is my help. Perusing multiple times isn’t sufficient. Yet, that prompted it. Morals permits me to understand Socrates, Cicero, Francis Bacon, Montaigne and so forth. As of late, Adam Smith’s “ethical emotions hypothesis” as an animal groups, as an animal varieties, are we pulled in to outsiders (And where we comprehend the restrictions of others). At that point that abruptly assaulted me. Freud recommended that outsiders who gave help were specialists. He is a physical exercise preparing, preparing once more, a specialist who sat, plunk down, heard, and reflected. Master outsiders. Today, I additionally need to know when, why and how this mastery is valuable, when and why, and how to impede the relationship with the individuals who are looking for help. I got back to my scaffold. An artwork