How New Orleans is a city of many nations

at
Categories
Tags

 

1. Explain how New Orleans is a city of many nations. List the nations including American Indians.

2. Summarize the “Question to Consider” section. What is meant by “Heritage or Hate?” Explain.

3. What is “The Cult of the Lost Cause?’ What Monuments were associated with this group in New Orleans?

4. Who was the Vice President of the Confederacy ? Provide a direct quote that confirmed the Confederate cause.

5. Explain how New Orleans was America’s largest slave market. Use a direct quote for this answer.

6. Explain why it is necessary to remove Confederate Monuments from New Oleans. Use a direct quote for this answer.

 

Sample Solution

How New Orleans is a city of many nations

New Orleans is a city in southeastern Louisiana, U.S. Unquestionably one of the most distinctive cities of the New World, New Orleans was established at great cost in an environment of conflict. Its strategic position, commanding the mouth of the great Mississippi-Missouri river system, which drains the rich interior of North America, made it a pawn in the struggles of Europeans for the control of North America. As a result, the peoples of New Orleans evolved a unique culture and society, while at the same time blending many heritages. Its citizens of Africa descent provided a special contribution in making New Orleans the birthplace of jazz. The city also has a solid economic base – it is the largest city in Louisiana, one of the country`s most important ports, a major tourist resort, and a medical, industrial, and educational center.

rates were related with low inflation rates and vice versa, as shown in the Phillips curve (Khan Academy, 2017). The theory was that a high demand for goods increased prices, which in turn stimulated companies to employ more people. Likewise, high employment rates augmented demand. During the 1970s stagflation, it became obvious that the link between inflation rates and employment levels was sometimes unstable. As a result, macroeconomists were unconvinced about Keynesianism, eventually steering to the end of the impact of Keynesian theories in economic strategies. Monetarist economists, such as Edmund Phelps and Milton Friedman clarified a shift in the Phillips curve: they maintained that when companies and workers anticipated high inflation, there was a shifting up of the Phillips curve, suggesting that high inflation can occur at any rate of unemployment (Khan Academy, 2017). Unambiguously, they argued that if inflation remained high for many years, workers and companies would begin emphasizing its consequences during wage negotiations, causing in a quick increase of earnings and firms’ prices, which further quickened inflation. This enlightenment was an extreme case of criticism of Keynesianism, and Keynesians progressively agreed the explanation. This reduced Keynesianism spread and influence on economic policies.

To conclude, it is evident that the spread and impact of Keynesianism was largely accelerated by the unmatched economic success and constancy in the post-war period from 1945 until 1973. The basis of Keynesianism was government intervention using active monetary and fiscal actions to normalize aggregate volatility in market economies. Its collapse could have accredited to the 1970s stagflation depicted by an instantaneous increase in both unemployment and inflation rates. Critics maintain that stagflation was an unavoidable heritage of demand management policies associated with Keynesian economy. The critical fall of Keynesianism was noticed by the end of the neoclassical synthesis conventional position because of empirical and theoretical weaknesses. The fall of Keynesianism was also triggered by the fact that many economists of that time did not take into account the probability of stagflation.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer