ART HISTORY

 

Compare and Contrast the two following works in essay format:
16th Ed. 15th Ed.
12-39 12-39 Eadwine the Scribe, The Scribe Eadwine from the
Eadwine Psalter, ca. 1160-1170.
14-15 14-15 Pietro Lorenzetti, Birth of the Virgin, 1342.
-Identify both works at the start. This establishes the comparison. Provide the name of the
artist (if known), title of the work (underlined), date, period, civilization and medium.
-Discuss the earlier of the two works first. Providing a description, discussion of the
subject matter (iconography) and purpose or function of the work. Then stylistically
analyze the work: medium, visual elements (line, shape, texture, space, color, light) and
the principles of design (balance, focal point, proportion and scale, rhythm, unity and
variety).
Close your discussion of the work with contextual reasons to explain why the work
looks the way it does. E.g., how the work is representative of its time period (history,
politics, religion, world view, society etc.).
-Then discuss the 2nd work providing the same information you did for the first work but
also noting any similarities and/or differences between the two.

 

 

Sample Solution

The importance of establishing a hierarchy became evident during the planning stage of the outdoor management course for the red team, the coordinators within the team assumed leadership roles but were unable to gain positional power due to the team being a peer group (Pettinger, 2007). The leaders selected had little authority and influence over the group as everyone was perceived to have the same rank, status and occupation, hence the leaders had none of French and Ravens five bases of power (Pettinger, 2007). The result was leaders with no positional power over the group, so could not direct the group with the method of leadership required for the situation. The task had significant constraints, particularly a short time frame and a large group size, for this situation Chelladurai recommends an autocratic leadership style would be most favourable (Chelladurai and Madella, 2006). The leaders attempted an autocratic leadership style, setting individual tasks for the group, however due to the poor leader member relations and lack of positional power the leadership structure quickly became a democracy. The product was an extremely unproductive workforce initially because of the time spent discussing how was best to approach the task. Because of how the leaders were perceived by the group there was little mutual trust, respect or confidence that the leaders were making the correct decisions, and as a result any management style they tried to implement would have been unsuccessful (Pettinger, 2007). Ultimately, if the leaders had analysed their position and the group they would have realised this and chosen a more democratic approach initially the group would have gained trust for the leaders, making future policy implementation easier. Teamwork Teamwork plays an essential role within both Fiedler’s Contingency Theory and Chelladurai’s Multi-dimensional model particularly regarding leader-member relations, if the group are familiar and trusting of the leader policy implementation becomes much simpler. Similarly to leadership, understanding and adapting to the situation is key to a leader being able to implement policies that ensure a group work as a team. Teamwork is a product of good leadership, and is again the responsibility of the leader to ensure the group are working successfully together. Highly functioning teams are essential within organisations to increase productivity and member satisfaction, by utilising the talents of all group members effectively within the constraints of the task, personal relationships and the group goals (Pettinger, 2007). Figure 2: Tuckman’s Model of Group Development (Agile Scrum Guide, 2019)

This question has been answered.

Get Answer