Mythic qualities of a persuasive message

at
Categories
Tags

 

 

 

 

 

STEP 1 First, use a theoretical lens to assess the narrative and mythic qualities of a persuasive message (of any kind). Choose from the following (or make the case for another theory of your choosing): Dramatism (focusing on comic- and tragic-framing), Genre theory, Equilibrium theory, or Codes theory.
STEP 2 Critique a published narrative inquiry, concretely explaining the construction and effectiveness of the essay’s central claim.
STEP 3 Develop a prospective research agenda for a project using narrative inquiry, which you will deliver as a 4-8 minute (virtual) presentation. Your agenda should: (a) concretely explain a culturally relevant, communication-intensive phenomenon or event; (b) present a research question or hypothesis about how narrative and myth are embedded in the phenomenon or event; and (c) provide a clear rationale for the project, explaining its relevance, its use of narrative inquiry, and its use of a select theoretical lens.
STEP 4 Lastly, create a visually-engaging instructional guide for conducting a narrative inquiry (entirely in your own words).

 

 

 

 

Sample Solution

National Youth Screening and Assessment Project, may also be available to support implementation. c. DJS should consider amending its practice of screening all youth who appear at the BCJJC for detention admission using the Detention Risk Assessment Instrument, even youth who will ultimately be diverted prior to DJS referral through the BPD Diversion Program. This will limit young people’s exposure to the detrimental impact and collateral consequences associated with generating unnecessary DJS and court records. d. BPD should develop a training and messaging strategy to increase officer knowledge and understanding of new policies and protocols for interacting with youth, the purpose of the juvenile court system, details of juvenile justice process, and the purpose of secure detention. Clear and consistent messaging for officers will help to mitigate the obdurate frustration that officers reportedly experience when they perceive that young people are not being held accountable by the system. e. Conduct a case processing analysis of adult-charged youth in detention to identify why time spent in detention for these youth has doubled from 2014 to 2018 and develop policies and programs to address the causes of delays. 2. Programs and Conditions a. The City should partner closely with DJS and the Baltimore JDAI Oversight Board to assess the continuum of Secure Detention Alternative established by DJS and the extent to which it meets existing needs. b. The City and its appropriate offices and agencies should partner with DJS to identify additional programs for youth in detention, in particular youth charged as adults, that can help young people build skills and connections that will help them succeed following release and return to their communities. c. To the extent that there are gaps in the existing Secure Detention Alternatives Continuum, the City and DJS should partner closely to identify resources to enhance the Alternative Continuum. As a resource, stakeholders should consult the results of the Youth Service Provider Survey conducted as part of this assessment. 3. Community Engagement and Partnerships

This question has been answered.

Get Answer