United Nations drug policy in mid 1980’s moved away from drug use to fighting the growing trend of international trafficking of psychotropic substances, which as a result of the enforcement and high risk associated with the trade course prices to increase, as the drug market is not regulated by authority rather it is determined by the supply and demand. However, the effort by local and international law enforcement agents to tackle or reduce the output of illicit drugs, did not brought about any shift in the quantity of output as the amount of drugs seized in previous years are doubled in the next cropping season, meaning that, Law enforcement is not the best approach for drug control (Antonio Maria Costa, Executive Director of UNODC, 2007). Also the enforcement to eradicate the production of cocoa crops, will not stop the farmers, farming which is only the main source of their income, rather, the measures will displace the farmers to other areas, causing the farmers to shift their attention to other areas, which are seen as safe place, the “Balloon effect”, the traffickers, small sellers and farmers will move to continue their business. The farmers who need little or no technology and cost to start farming will use the opportunity created by law enforcement personnel to cultivate new crops in their new location, while the traffickers will look for new routes to transit their drugs, and the petty sellers to change the location of operation. However, the containment programme like interdiction and illicit drug enforcement laws will create artificial scarcity while the price of heroin, cocaine and marijuana will go up. The more risk involved to obtain and sell illicit drugs, the more prices will go up, consumers will have to pay a higher price to obtain the drug, the price rise will result in low consumption, and the less risk will result to more drugs available, cheaper price and pure quality, unlike where the price is high, traffickers and petty sellers will adulterat