Literature Review

1. Describe the motivation the authors had for their work. What makes their work so important? (You may find it useful to provide some background and context here.)
2. Who would be interested in reading this paper (domain experts, GVSU departments, outside organizations, etc.)?
3. What are the paper’s main research hypotheses or contributions?
4. What did the researchers do to test their hypotheses or achieve their research contributions?
5. What are the long-term contributions that will still be relevant 10, 20, 30, … years from now?
6. Which of its citations appear to be the most relevant resources for exploring this topic further?

Sample Solution.

As of late the New Mexico judge permitted the doctor to help the perishing of the patients that has the terminally disease, the province of New Mexico will possibly turn into the fifth state in the United States after Oregon, Washington, Montana and Vermont. This issue before long become the most attractive issues as of late and raised the discussion of such issue alongside the clinical morals, religions and basic freedoms that was at that point comes for a really long time, and this article will contain the contention that for what reason should the doctor helped self destruction alongside its real and intentionally practice ought to be defended according to the viewpoint of the independence of the patients and it’s incununous to the general public under current conditions.

Meaning of doctor helped self destruction

It’s difficult to perceive the result and have a genuine view about cer

This question has been answered.

Get Answer