Develop, in detail, a situation in which a health care worker might be confronted with ethical problems related to patients and prescription drug use OR patients in a state of poverty.
Your scenario must be original to you and this assignment. It cannot be from the discussion boards in this class or any other previous forum.
Articulate (and then assess) the ethical solutions that can found using “care” (care-based ethics) and “rights” ethics to those problems.
Assessment must ask if the solutions are flawed, practicable, persuasive, etc.
What health care technology is involved in the situation? What moral guidelines for using that kind of healthcare technology should be used there? Explore such guidelines also using utilitarianism, Kantian deontology, ethical egoism, or social contract ethics.
Say how social technologies such as blogs, crowdfunding, online encyclopedias can be used in either case. What moral guidelines for using that kind of healthcare technology should be used there? Develop such guidelines also using utilitarianism, Kantian deontology, ethical egoism, or social contract ethics.
Situation: Sarah works as a nurse practitioner at a community health clinic. One of her regular patients, John, a 42-year-old construction worker, struggles with chronic pain from a work injury. He has been prescribed opioids for several years, but Sarah suspects he may be developing an addiction.
Ethical Concerns:
Ethical Solutions:
Care-Based Approach:
Rights-Based Approach:
Assessment:
Care-Based Approach: This approach prioritizes John’s well-being and respects his autonomy. However, it might be time-consuming and could be perceived as enabling John’s potential addiction.
Rights-Based Approach: This approach upholds John’s right to know the risks but might cause him pain during the tapering process and could discourage him from seeking help if he feels judged.
Utilitarianism: Focusing on the greatest good for the greatest number, this approach would likely favor the rights-based approach, aiming to prevent long-term harm to John and potential misuse of prescription drugs.
Kantian Deontology: This approach emphasizes duty and acting in a way that can be universalized. Here, Sarah has a duty to act in John’s best interest (care) while also considering potential harms to him and others (rights). A combination of both approaches might be most appropriate.
Ethical Egoism: Focused on self-interest, this approach wouldn’t be ideal for a healthcare professional. Sarah’s primary concern should be John’s well-being, not protecting herself from potential legal repercussions.
Social Contract Ethics: This approach emphasizes the importance of societal rules that benefit everyone. Sarah has an obligation to follow ethical guidelines for prescribing medications, which aligns with the rights-based approach.
Healthcare Technology: Electronic Health Records (EHRs) can be used to monitor John’s medication history and track his progress during the tapering process. However, strict privacy controls are essential to safeguard John’s medical information.
Social Technologies:
Moral Guidelines:
Conclusion:
Balancing care and cost in the face of potential opioid addiction requires careful consideration of ethical principles. By utilizing a combination of care-based and rights-based approaches, and responsibly using relevant technology and social media, healthcare professionals can strive to achieve the best possible outcomes for their patients.