A woman’s pregnancy

at
Categories
Tags

 

1. A pregnant woman comes into the clinic. Her first pregnancy was an abortion at 8 weeks. Her second pregnancy resulted in a delivery at 38 weeks. Her third pregnancy was twins and she delivered at 29 wks. 1 of those children died. Answer this question

2. A woman comes into the clinic to be seen for her 2nd pregnancy. Her first pregnancy was twins delivered at 37 wks and both children are living. . Answer this question

3. A woman comes in for her 6 week postpartum check up. She delivered triplets at 28 wks and 2 of the babies survived. She had a previous pregnancy that ended in an elective abortion at 6 wks. . Answer this question

4. This is a woman’s 6th pregnancy. Her previous births were a singleton delivery at 41 week, a singleton at 39 5/7 weeks, a singleton at 38 6/7 and a singleton at 36 5/7 weeks. She had 1 induced abortion at 10 weeks with 4 living children at this time. . Answer this question

5. A pregnant woman carried one pregnancy to term with a surviving infant; carried one pregnancy to 35 weeks with surviving twins; carried one pregnancy to 9 weeks as an ecto. pic (tubal) pregnancy; and has 3 living children. . Answer this question

6. A woman who has given birth to one child at term once and has had one miscarriage at 12 weeks would be recorded as? . Answer this question

Using Naegele’s rule:
7. A woman’s LMP was April, 10th 2021. What is her EDD? . Answer this

8. A woman’s LMP was 9/4/10. What was her EDD? . Answer this

9. A woman’s LMP was January 5th, 2022. What is her EDD? . Answer this

10. A woman’s LMP was November 3rd, 2021. What is her . EDD? Answer this question

 

 

 

 

Sample Solution

Despite the fact that tax assessment has its reasonable advantages, it’s anything but an ideal mediation to address the unmistakable market disappointment that is happening. Initially, the versatility of interest for red meat should be considered. In the event that the interest for red meat is profoundly inelastic, it will deliver the duty futile in light of the fact that the slight expansion in the cost of red meats will significantly affect interest. In a 2011study it was assessed that the uncompensated cost flexibilities for hamburger and pork (famous red meats) in 2009 was – 0.594 and – 0.779 separately, meaning they are both cost inelastic (Tiffin et al 2011). Consequently the assessment is probably going to affect utilization since customers will in any case purchase red meats like hamburger and pork notwithstanding the ascent in cost.

As found in Figure 2, in the outline on the right, we see a decent with a cost inelastic interest, for example, is the situation for meat and pork. At the point when an assessment is carried out on supply from S1 to S + charge the fall in amount from Q1 to Q2 is substantially less critical than that in the chart on the left. In this manner the public authority can’t rest assured how powerful the assessment is probably going to be.

One more issue with tax assessment as a type of government mediation is that there might be trouble setting the right worth of the duty. Assuming the financial worth of the negative externality of red meat utilization is difficult to gauge then it could be set excessively high or low. For instance, on the off chance that the duty rate is set too low, the assessment will be insufficient particularly when combined with the way that most red meats have a cost inelastic requests. Purchasers will be undeterred by the expense yet purchase red meat as they regularly would. Nonetheless, on the off chance that the assessment is set too high, this makes a motivating force for purchasers to try not to pay the expense through means, for example, “smuggling”. This won’t be great for the public authority and they are probably going to need to execute rigid guidelines to stop this

This question has been answered.

Get Answer