About the company’s core values

at
Categories
Tags

I need to write an essay regarding a company’s core values where I am being interviewed

Find the details below:

The Leadership Team at Delta Defense LLC has created a set of “Core Values” for a very specific purpose. When you are done reading about our core values, please write an essay describing, in detail, your thoughts and feelings about our Core Values.

This essay should answer the questions:

Do you feel you are aligned with our core values… Why or Why not?
Do you think it’s beneficial for a company to articulate their core values?
1.) We believe in inalienable right to self-defense. DEFINITION: The founding fathers of our country affirmed the natural-born right of free people to defend themselves when they added the 2nd Amendment to our bill of rights.

2.) We have a growth mindset. DEFINITION: Belief that people and businesses are either growing or dying. Some people have a scarcity mindset and some people have a growth mindset. Growth results from embracing change.

3.) We get shit done. DEFINITION: There’s on old saying that ‘the fast eat
the slow’. Slow execution is the kiss of death for any business initiative.

4.) We deal with problems ‘head on”. DEFINITION: When conflict occurs
(which it will), we address and solve the conflict directly. If not able to solve, we “roll it uphill” and ask for help. We NEVER engage in sideways or downstream negative talk!

5.) We live the 5H’s. DEFINITION: We are Honest, Humble, Happy, Hungry, and Healthy.

Following completion of the essay, please save in a word document and return to me. We will be looking to extend interview invitations to selected candidates.

 

Sample Solution

I feel very aligned with Delta Defense LLC’s core value of inalienable right to self-defense. I believe that people have the right to protect themselves and their properties from harm, whether it be an intruder or a government trying to infringe on one’s rights. This is a fundamental human right which should never be taken away regardless of race, gender or any other factor (Paine, 1776). The founding fathers also agreed as evidenced by their decision to include the Second Amendment in our bill of rights which further affirms this basic tenant of liberty (United States Constitution).

I think it is beneficial for companies like Delta Defense LLC to articulate their core values because it helps create meaning and purpose within the organization. Being clear about what your values are allows employees and customers alike to understand how decisions are being made within the company as well as how they can best support its mission (Kirinovic et al., 2019). Without stated values there could potentially be confusion amongst stakeholders when making decisions that conflict; having these principles clearly outlined eliminates such ambiguity so everyone knows why certain actions were taken even if they do not agree with them.

In conclusion, I strongly believe in the right of individuals to defend themselves and am glad that Delta Defense LLC shares this same view. It is important for companies such as these which provide defense products and services to make their core values known publicly so others can decide if they would like to align themselves with those beliefs when considering doing business together or joining its team. This will ensure greater clarity while promoting transparency between all parties involved moving forward into the future.

Transient memory is the memory for a boost that goes on for a brief time (Carlson, 2001). In reasonable terms visual transient memory is frequently utilized for a relative reason when one can’t thoroughly search in two spots immediately however wish to look at least two prospects. Tuholski and partners allude to momentary memory similar to the attendant handling and stockpiling of data (Tuholski, Engle, and Baylis, 2001).

They additionally feature the way that mental capacity can frequently be antagonistically impacted by working memory limit. It means quite a bit to be sure about the typical limit of momentary memory as, without a legitimate comprehension of the flawless cerebrum’s working it is challenging to evaluate whether an individual has a shortage in capacity (Parkin, 1996).

 

This survey frames George Miller’s verifiable perspective on transient memory limit and how it tends to be impacted, prior to bringing the examination state-of-the-art and outlining a determination of approaches to estimating momentary memory limit. The verifiable perspective on momentary memory limit

 

Length of outright judgment

The range of outright judgment is characterized as the breaking point to the precision with which one can distinguish the greatness of a unidimensional boost variable (Miller, 1956), with this cutoff or length generally being around 7 + 2. Mill operator refers to Hayes memory length try as proof for his restricting range. In this members needed to review data read resoundingly to them and results obviously showed that there was a typical maximum restriction of 9 when double things were utilized.

This was regardless of the consistent data speculation, which has proposed that the range ought to be long if each introduced thing contained little data (Miller, 1956). The end from Hayes and Pollack’s tests (see figure 1) was that how much data sent expansions in a straight design alongside how much data per unit input (Miller, 1956). Figure 1. Estimations of memory for data wellsprings of various sorts and bit remainders, contrasted with anticipated results for steady data. Results from Hayes (left) and Pollack (right) refered to by (Miller, 1956)

 

Pieces and lumps

Mill operator alludes to a ‘digit’ of data as need might have arisen ‘to settle on a choice between two similarly probable other options’. In this manner a basic either or choice requires the slightest bit of data; with more expected for additional complicated choices, along a twofold pathway (Miller, 1956). Decimal digits are worth 3.3 pieces each, implying that a 7-digit telephone number (what is handily recollected) would include 23 pieces of data. Anyway an evident inconsistency to this is the way that, assuming an English word is worth around 10 pieces and just 23 pieces could be recollected then just 2-3 words could be recalled at any one time, clearly mistaken. The restricting range can all the more likely be figured out concerning the absorption of pieces into lumps.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer