Sample Solution

Charlotte is a Swedish national, making her an EU resident under Article 20 TFEU . Under Article 21 EU residents reserve the option to move and live openly in another Member State. She has been playing for Tooting for as far back as 4 years and gets £1,500 per coordinate played. Article 2 (1) of the Directive 2004/38 characterizes what and EU resident is too case law, explicitly the Lawrie-Blum v Baden-Württemberg case. She is offering a support through playing netball and has an agreement and furthermore gets a money related prize for each match played. At last, she has indistinguishable rights from Sandra. Her laborer status implies she is ensured under Article 25. She has had the option to remain longer than 3 months as she has been working for the entire 4 years and has adequate financial salary. Under Article 45 TFEU Charlotte has the option to “remain in a Member State with the end goal of business and stay in the domain of a Member State in the wake of having been utilized in that express.” The Directive 2004/38 gives Charlotte the privilege got her and her relatives to enter, exit and dwell unreservedly inside the region of the Member State. Rights set out in Article 20 (2) TFEU are additionally appropriate to Charlotte: “the option to move and live openly in the Member State, the option to cast a ballot and remain as applicants in races to the European Parliament, option to appreciate the domain of the Member State, security of the political and consular specialists of any Member State on indistinguishable conditions from the nationals of that State.” She is likewise qualified for fairness as far as lodging, business, instruction and social rights under Regulation 492/2011 . Article 16 of Directive 2004/38 incorporates the privilege of perpetual habitation for a Union specialist and their relatives. The Union residents procure this privilege following a multi year time of ceaseless legitimate living arrangement 9 (Art 16 (1) of the Directive 2004/38