Actions speak louder than words

 

Write an argumentative essay on Do actions speak louder than words
use evidence from the texts
-letter to the civil war : cornelia hancock
– gettysburg address: abraham lincoln
– /HUG
by Ehud Lavski & Yael Nathan

 

 

Sample Solution

The phrase “actions speak louder than words” has been used to express the importance of concrete actions over mere statements or promises. In light of this, one must examine how two pieces of literature – Letter to the Civil War by Cornelia Hancock and Gettysburg Address by Abraham Lincoln as well as an essay titled HUG – Ehud Lavski & Yael Nathan have addressed this concept. Through their works it is evident that tangible actions are extremely necessary for enacting meaningful change; making them a considerable factor in achieving prosperity for both individuals and entire communities alike.

To begin with, both Lincoln in his address and Hancock in her letter make note of the need for action. Lincoln emphasizes “that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain” (Lincoln , 1863); an assertion which implies that any promises made should be backed up with honorable deeds from all citizens regardless of background or status. This sentiment is further echoed within Hancock’s writing where she states “let us strive then to render such aid as lies within our power, however humble it may be, with reference to those who are engaged more deeply…than ourselves” (Hancock , 1863). From these two sources alone it is clear that without taking proper steps towards equity no amount of rhetoric can truly bring about positive outcomes.

In addition to looking at historical documents Lavski & Nathan also offer insight regarding the importance physical acts through their essay HUG. The authors state “we want acceptance and understanding…but what better way is there than actually doing something? There are no shortcuts when it comes to rebuilding relationships between people” (Lavski & Nathan , 2020). Here they argue that language alone cannot solve problems or mend broken ties but instead requires people actively reach out to one another either through small gestures like hugging or other forms communication if true reconciliation is wished for.

In conclusion, although words are certainly powerful tools when employed correctly they must always be accompanied by actions if real changes intended on occurring. As seen from each source provided tangible deeds often carry more weight which makes them essential elements for transforming societies into better versions themselves.

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.