Write a 2-page written response detailing your selection of one policymaking framework that best supports your priority (Food insecurity among children)—particularly, getting your priority on the agenda.
In your response, explain why the framework best describes how you might proceed in effectively moving your advocacy priority forward in the policymaking process.
Support your response with evidence. Consider which of the three models might best fit your priority determined
Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF)
Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Framework (KSF)
Narrative Policy Framework (NPF)
Prioritizing Food Security for Children: A Narrative Policy Framework Approach
Food insecurity, defined as the limited or uncertain access to affordable, nutritious food, is a significant threat to children’s health and well-being. This paper argues that the Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) is the most suitable framework for effectively moving the issue of childhood food insecurity onto the policymaking agenda and securing policy change.
Why the Narrative Policy Frameworks Works Best
The NPF emphasizes the power of storytelling in shaping public opinion and influencing policy decisions. It highlights three key elements:
This framework aligns well with the issue of childhood food insecurity for the following reasons:
Moving Childhood Food Security onto the Agenda
The NPF approach suggests a multi-pronged strategy to get the issue of childhood food insecurity onto the policy agenda:
Evidence Supporting the NPF Approach
Several successful policy changes illustrate the effectiveness of the NPF approach in addressing social issues. For example, the anti-smoking movement successfully used a narrative that linked smoking to health problems, economic costs, and a decline in quality of life. This narrative helped garner public support and ultimately led to stricter regulations on tobacco use.
Similarly, the movement for increased funding for early childhood education used a narrative that emphasized the long-term economic benefits of investing in early childhood development. This narrative resonated with policymakers and helped secure increased funding for early childhood programs.
Conclusion
The Narrative Policy Framework offers a powerful approach to advancing the issue of childhood food insecurity on the policy agenda. By crafting a compelling narrative, identifying a policy window, and mobilizing policy entrepreneurs, advocates can raise public awareness, build support, and ultimately secure policy changes that ensure all children have access to the nutritious food they need to thrive.
Additional Considerations
While the NPF is a strong starting point, it’s important to acknowledge that policymaking is a complex process. Combining the NPF approach with elements from other frameworks can be beneficial.
By employing a multifaceted approach that leverages the strengths of different frameworks, advocates can increase the chances of successfully addressing the issue of childhood food insecurity.