African American History

Q1

What was Booker T. Washington’s ideas on education for African Americans? Do you agree with it? Why or Why not?

Q2

Explain what freedom meant to the newly freed slaves. What were their major concerns? If you were alive during this period, would these be your concerns? Why or why not?

Q3

What was the convict lease system? Why do you believe this system developed? Does a similar system exist today?

Q4

What change did World War I have on the African American men who fought in it? How did society react to this change? If you were alive during this period would you have changed this way? Why or Why Not?

Sample Solution

this would be ‘perilous’). In the event that a reasoning being is one showing the clear characteristics of a person, at that point we should simply establish how to recreate a human brain with a PC program.

Taking everything into account, Searle contends that the cerebrum’s psyche isn’t a PC program since it only controls images without appending importance to them, much like a straightforward mini-computer. It can anyway be contended that we as of now have some basic AI programs which seem to emulate human conduct and further projects which go somehow or another towards breaking down their own conduct and ‘gaining from it’. As believing is abstract, the main way we can assume this comprises believing is by a target test like the Turing test.

Further, there is nothing in human awareness – emotions and wants, which can’t be distinguished and comprehended as a computational capacity, like anything discovered inside any adequately unpredictable PC. In an ongoing narrative, Professor Winston (BBC) clarified that our selection of accomplices is to a great extent down to pheromones, which makes a joke of what we know as ‘affection’. Without a doubt, people accept that they are somehow or another elite with their emotions, convictions and wants, however these are summarized as ‘society brain research’ by Churchland, who accepts such mental wonders are simply speculations which will stop to exist in time with logical advancement (Churchland, pp. 194 – 201). At last, while even the most impressive PCs come down to on off switches, it appears to be likely at any rate in equal, that human minds have comparable usefulness. In solid AI, the equipment – the PC itself or framework under which the program runs, is immaterial – the program matters, thus the view that it is conceivable to make something with usefulness comparable to the human cerebrum sensibly brings the end that the human psyche is isolated to the body and that a similar kind of brain could work in any identical ‘equipment’. Along these lines, man-made consciousness in what Searle calls the solid sense, is conceivable.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer