Al Qaeda and ISIS

 

 

Now that both al Qaeda and ISIS have become parent organizations, which franchise or affiliate of AQ or ISIS do you feel is the greatest threat to the U.S. Homeland?
Both AQ and ISIS have demonstrated the ability to adapt as well as recover from major military offensives. Can you picture a day when AQ and ISIS could get over their differences and merge?
When it comes to developing and evaluating counterterrorism and homeland security policies, programs and protocols, is there an appropriate mix of offensive overseas actions and defensive security measures, and what criteria for evaluation do you think are most relevant?
If terrorism is really a tactic or technique to gain attention for a cause (a means of communication) what are your thoughts on prosecuting a “War On Terror? Is this helpful or a detractor for counter terrorism?

Sample Solution

Al Qaeda and ISIS

There are both similarities and differences between Al Qaeda and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS). Both are bloodthirsty terrorist organizations bent on jihad, sworn enemies of the infidel West and the united states in particular. Could they one day unite in an international jihadist merger to create an even more potent regional and global threat? It is possible. For the moment, at least, the two groups are rivals for the mantle of jihad supremacy and neither side`s leadership has shown much interest in a union. The situation is extremely fluid, though, so it is not inconceivable that at some point in the future, beyond the current leadership perhaps, the two organizations could become one. In terms of their worldview and ideology, the two enterprises are close. Both see Islam under threat by hostile forces primarily in the West. Both Al Qaeda and ISIS see themselves as global movements with global ambitions.

 

 

 

Hamlet and Revenge

Hamlet and retribution of vengeance have made numerous individuals breakdown. The idea of its utilization drives individuals to act deceitfully through annoyance as opposed to reason. Vengeance is simple sensible feeling; one turn merits another round. In any case, this is a risky hypothesis. Vengeance is the primary topic in Hamlet. Fortinbras, Laertes, and Hamlet are looking for vengeance for their dad’s demise. In any case, thusly, every one of the three individuals rely upon feeling as opposed to suspecting and make an extremely large wager.

Hamlet and retribution are hopeless organizations attempting vengeance and those looking for retribution (Hamlet) inevitably face demise after the wrongdoing. History of misfortune of retribution Prosser’s view on Hamlet’s vengeance “Saints are asked to fight back, as most misfortunes of retaliation, casualties or wrongdoings are legitimately identified with the hero” (Prosser) of retribution The impacts of misfortune incorporate Julius Caesar, Macbeth and Andronis. In Shakespeare ‘s paper by Shakespeare, Shakespeare centers around vengeance and builds up the idea of death in the play. What is the awfulness of the retribution of the Elizabethan time? This is a misfortune, its thought process is vengeance, and its fundamental plot incorporates the procedure of counter. The awfulness of retribution in the long run prompted the passing of the killer and the Avengers himself. In misfortune of vengeance, we need three letters.

Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” shows the overall components found in the awfulness of the vengeance of the renaissance (“misfortune of retribution”). Be that as it may, despite the fact that Hamlet is a misfortune of retribution, Shakespeare convolutes the fundamental vengeance plot by making three retribution plots. By including significant developments, Shakespeare makes ‘Ship of the Concentric Revenge Miwa’ (Frye 90) which is certainly not a physical legend yet an apparition, not a phantom, yet a scholarly saint who is an issue. did. viewpoint

In Shakespeare’s ‘Hamlet’ retribution, Shakespeare vindicated as the subject of the considerable number of works. Retribution assumes a significant job in the improvement of Fortinbras, Prince of Norway, Hamlet, the Prince of Denmark, and the child of Polonius Laertes. Each of the three requested vengeance for their dad’s homicide. In Hamlet, vengeance can be deciphered as another character. Everybody looking for vengeance will defeat it. To begin with, after each murder every child has a reasonable activity plan.

 

 

 

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer