In this chapter, you learned about Albert Bandura’s Social Learning Theory. Consider the many different behaviors that you engage in on a daily basis and
identify one or two that you think you learned through modeling. In one to two paragraphs discuss these behaviors (only discuss positive behaviors!) and
how they came to be modeled. Note: You must include textbook data regarding this theory in your response and cite it appropriately.
One example of a behavior I have modeled after observing someone else is cooking. My father was an excellent cook who enjoyed making meals for our family every night with fresh ingredients and unique recipes. By watching him in the kitchen and learning his various techniques, I started to gain confidence in my own cooking abilities which eventually led me to start experimenting with different dishes on my own. Additionally, by having my father provide verbal encouragement while I cooked allowed me to view this particular activity as something enjoyable rather than challenging; thus reinforcing my desire to continue practicing this skill (Bandura, 1977).
Another behavior that I acquired through social learning was taking pride in my academic performance. As a child, my parents were always open about their educational backgrounds and the importance of doing well in school. They provided both emotional support when needed but also held me accountable for any bad grades or missed assignments; creating expectations for how I should conduct myself academically but at the same time also showing their faith in me that I could meet these expectations (Bandura, 1977). Thus, through modeling their committed attitude towards education and utilizing rewards like praise whenever appropriate, helped shape my current work ethic when it comes to academics.
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi