All-hazards Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) utilizing the Basic Plan

at
Categories
Tags

 

Write an all-hazards Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) utilizing the Basic Plan templet for the fictional location of Bobsville. (see attached) Requirements 1. Do not add any additional sections. Only use what is found in the template. No Promulgation Statement. 2. Use the exact headings and numbering as is found in the template. Do not add any additional numbers or headings or change the numbers or headings found in the template. 3. Use bullet points if you need to distinguish between certain items in a section, but do not add additional numbers. Also, do not add additional sections. I only want what is in the template. Single space or double space EOP. Utilize the Verdana 12 point black font. Paper’s top, bottom, left, and right margins must be set at 1-inch.

 

Sample Solution

An Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), which outlines how a facility would react to and recover from all dangers, is a requirement for hospitals. The six essential components of the Joint Commission’s emergency management standards are included in it: Communications, assets and resources, staff responsibilities, safety and security, utilities, and clinical support activities With the “all hazards” strategy, it is possible to respond to a variety of situations with different scopes, durations, and causes. The EOP addresses recovery strategies, starting and ending response and recovery phases, activating authorities, and identifying alternative places for care, treatment, and services. It also discusses capabilities and processes when the hospital cannot be supported by the community.

s after a war, it is the responsibility of the leader to judge what to do with the enemy (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332).. Again, proportionality is emphasised. For example, the Versailles treaty imposed after the First World War is questionably too harsh, as it was not all Germany’s fault for the war. This is supported by Frowe, who expresses two views in jus post bellum: Minimalism and Maximalism, which are very differing views. Minimalists suggest a more lenient approach while maximalist, supporting the above example, provides a harsher approach, punishing the enemy both economically and politically (Frowe (2010), Page 208). At the last instance, however, the aim of war is to establish peace security, so whatever needs to be done can be morally justified, if it follows the rules of jus ad bellum.
In conclusion, just war theory is very contestable and can argue in different ways. However, the establishment of a just peace is crucial, making all war type situation to have different ways of approaching (Frowe (2010), Page 227). Nevertheless, the just war theory comprises of jus ad bellum, jus in bello and jus post bellum, and it can be either morally controversial or justifiable depending on the proportionality of the circumstance. Therefore, there cannot be one definitive theory of the just war but only a theoretical guide to show how wars should be fought, showing normativity in its account, which answers the question to what a just war theory is.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer