America must address the root causes of terrorism

 

While watching the news on TV one night, you hear a scholar suggest that America must address the root causes of terrorism. What does this mean and will “addressing root causes” eliminate all terrorist attacks?

Sample Solution

Global terrorism has been a major threat to peace and security across the world. It has impacted various regions differently and has had far-reaching consequences on a global scale. Terrorists are considered to be the masters of mind control. Despite the fact that they only murder a small number of individuals, they are able to terrorize billions of people and disturb powerful governmental institutions like the European Union or the US. There is no better and more-efficient remedy to the threat posed by terrorism than prevention, noting that history demonstrates the limits of merely responding to imminent or actual terrorist acts without addressing the conditions that lead to them. Therefore, counter-terrorism measures must be employed in tandem with initiatives to address the drivers of marginalization, exclusion, inequality, injustice and lack of opportunity.

the combination of failures and instability in foreign policy, economy, and religious reformation had the overall effect of putting the state under enough pressure to threaten its collapse. Jones’ description has since proved to be controversial amongst historians who indicate that the label of a ‘crisis’ cannot be consistently used across the reigns of Edward VI and Mary I. Thus, this essay will individually examine the prince regent and lord president who ruled on the behalf of the minor Edward VI, The Duke of Somerset and the Duke of Northumberland (John Dudley), as well as the reign of Mary I in order to understand whether the label of ‘crisis’ can be applied across the ‘Mid-Tudor’ period. Historians agree that the attempted campaign to bring Lady Jane Grey to the throne was a point of a crisis, as it concerned the succession and thus the state itself. Therefore, this essay will not consider the succession crisis but examine the rest of the period to consider if the regency, presidency and reign, and therefore if the period as a whole, can be considered a ‘crisis’. One can recognise that the Lord Protector Somerset was eventually overwhelmed by the vast economic hardship and religious discontent fostered within the peasantry, which he himself did not aid with a misguided and costly foreign policy, culminating in his downfall in 1549. However, the following leader of the Privy Council, the Duke of Northumberland, proved to be a more competent leader. As Lord President, Northumberland took key measures to bring England out of a state of crisis through his economic and foreign policies, creating a diplomatic peace abroad to crucially focus on domestic issues. Whilst Northumberland sought to fix damage caused under Somerset, Mary I’s reign can be seen as one of progression. With a monarch finally ruling the country directly again, Mary was able to secure the only realistic ally against the Valois and gained economic gains from the Spanish marriage. Therefore, whilst the period of Somerset’s regency can be labelled a crisis, the period as a whole cannot be labelled a ‘Mid-Tudor Crisis’.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.