American Imperialism

 

In the late nineteenth century, the United States showed a heightened interest in establishing an overseas empire. The example of European nations and Japan, which were seizing colonies in Asia and Africa, stimulated this expansionism. As a result, America’s territorial boundaries will extend beyond its borders, and its territory will include colonial possessions.

INSTRUCTIONS:

In order to prepare you must complete the following readings:

· Review and identify the sections of Chapter 21 that address the topics that are relevant to this essay.

· Read the linked articles and use at least one of them for your essay to support your discussion:

·

1. Henry Cabot Lodge on expansionism

2. New York Herald Tribune on the War and yellow press

3. De Lôme Letter transcript

4. Platt Amendment 1903 transcript

· Identify and incorporate at least one additional outside source to support your discussion. In addition to the textbook, you may use any material outside of the textbook that is recommended in the Additional Reading section at the end of each chapter. You are also encouraged to do your own research and identify relevant sources. Please keep in mind that WIKIPEDIA is not an acceptable reference.

Write a well-organized essay, a minimum of 700 words (but not limited to), including supporting details from the documents/textbook/other sources, in which you analyze the assigned readings and address the following question:

Discuss the economic, strategic, and ideological factors that contributed to American interest in overseas expansion in the latter part of the nineteenth century, and how the U. S. achieved this expansion. As part of your analysis and discussion identify the arguments of both critics and supporters of imperialism, evaluating, and explaining who had the strongest arguments.

Sample Solution

American Imperialism

“American imperialism” is a term that refers to the economic, military, and cultural influence of the United States internationally. First popularized during the presidency of James K. Polk, the concept of an “American Empire” was made a reality through the latter half of the 1800s. During this time, industrialization caused American businessmen to seek new international markets in which to sell their goods. In addition, the increasing influence of social Darwinism led to the belief that the United States was inherently responsible for bringing concepts such as industry, democracy, and Christianity to less developed “savage” societies. The combination of these attitudes and other factors led to the United States toward imperialism.

Another significant explanation that conciliation was so dubious was that it affirmed that Chamberlain misjudged Adolf Hitler and his drive for global control which straightforwardly undermined British public safety. On September 30th, 1938, Chamberlain marked the Munich Pact surrendering Sudetenland to Germany and in doing as such, consoled the British public that this would be Germany’s last regional interest.” Chamberlain’s slip-up was to placed his trust into Hitler and is portrayed by antiquarian Keith Middlemas as ‘strategy of deception.’ This revisionist view tested the ethical quality of conciliation and recommended that the arrangement was one of ineptitude and self-duplicity.’ The British Prime Minister misjudged the advantage of Hitler, pacification depended on the deception that Hitler would stop after Munich, Chamberlain accepting his aspirations were restricted to the amendment of the Treaty of Versailles which could be settled through exchange and arrangements in spite of proof of German rearmament. The misstatement of Germany made settlement dubious as he wrongly took Hitler’s statement, that he was a confided in pioneer and as indicated by Nick Smart he “understood that the world could see he had been taken for a sucker” and ‘it was difficult to accept.” This was additionally compounded by the conviction that Adolf Hitler was “favorable to British.” His rehashed confirmations that he respected the British Empire and could never do battle with Britain added to Chamberlain’s fancy. Student of history Patrick Buchanan contends that there was no requirement for GB to pronounce battle on Germany in September 1939 as Hitler didn’t need a conflict with Britain, his inclination being a coalition with GB against socialism Russia. However ahead of schedule as May 1933 Alfred Rosenberg seemed to be sent by Hitler to search out amicable contacts and this combined with the conviction that Germany’s genuine complaints ought to be tended to, Chamberlain accepted that Germany would be happy with concessions utilizing discretion yet this was to be just impermanent as the control of Czechoslovakia was to show. Chamberlain’s three visits

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.