An inductive/deductive argument

 

What is an inductive/deductive argument? Name one KIND of each argument then give an example of each.
What is soundness/validity? Can we have one without the other? Give an example of each (along with examples of that lack both/either).
What is an informal fallacy? Pick two fallacies and explain them using/with your own examples.
What are the five principles of honest dialectical engagement (aka, the rules of engagement)? Identify and explain/define (w/examples).

Sample Solution

Inductive and Deductive Arguments

Inductive Argument: An argument that moves from specific observations to a general conclusion.

  • Example: Every swan we’ve ever seen is white. Therefore, all swans are white.

Deductive Argument: An argument that moves from a general premise to a specific conclusion.

  • Example: All mammals are warm-blooded. Dogs are mammals. Therefore, dogs are warm-blooded.

Soundness and Validity

Soundness: An argument is sound if it is both valid and has true premises.

  • Example: All mammals are warm-blooded. Dogs are mammals. Therefore, dogs are warm-blooded. (This is a sound argument because it’s valid and the premises are true.)

Validity: An argument is valid if its conclusion logically follows from its premises, regardless of whether the premises are true.

  • Example: All cats are dogs. Fluffy is a cat. Therefore, Fluffy is a dog. (This is a valid argument, but it’s not sound because the first premise is false.)

It’s possible to have a valid argument that is not sound, but it’s not possible to have a sound argument that is not valid.

Informal Fallacies

Ad Hominem: Attacking the person making the argument rather than the argument itself.

  • Example: “You can’t trust John’s opinion on climate change because he’s a liberal.”

Appeal to Authority: Relying on the authority of an individual or institution without providing evidence to support the claim.

  • Example: “Dr. Smith says that this product works, so it must be effective.”

Five Principles of Honest Dialectical Engagement

  1. Truth-Seeking: A genuine commitment to finding the truth, rather than simply winning an argument.
  2. Open-Mindedness: A willingness to consider alternative viewpoints and to change one’s own beliefs if necessary.
  3. Respectful Dialogue: Engaging in respectful and civil discourse, even when disagreeing with others.
  4. Clarity and Precision: Clearly articulating one’s arguments and avoiding ambiguity.
  5. Critical Thinking: Evaluating arguments carefully and identifying potential biases and fallacies.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer