An inductive/deductive argument

 

What is an inductive/deductive argument? Name one KIND of each argument then give an example of each.
What is soundness/validity? Can we have one without the other? Give an example of each (along with examples of that lack both/either).
What is an informal fallacy? Pick two fallacies and explain them using/with your own examples.
What are the five principles of honest dialectical engagement (aka, the rules of engagement)? Identify and explain/define (w/examples).

Sample Solution

Inductive and Deductive Arguments

Inductive Argument: An argument that moves from specific observations to a general conclusion.

  • Example: Every swan we’ve ever seen is white. Therefore, all swans are white.

Deductive Argument: An argument that moves from a general premise to a specific conclusion.

  • Example: All mammals are warm-blooded. Dogs are mammals. Therefore, dogs are warm-blooded.

Soundness and Validity

Soundness: An argument is sound if it is both valid and has true premises.

  • Example: All mammals are warm-blooded. Dogs are mammals. Therefore, dogs are warm-blooded. (This is a sound argument because it’s valid and the premises are true.)

Validity: An argument is valid if its conclusion logically follows from its premises, regardless of whether the premises are true.

  • Example: All cats are dogs. Fluffy is a cat. Therefore, Fluffy is a dog. (This is a valid argument, but it’s not sound because the first premise is false.)

It’s possible to have a valid argument that is not sound, but it’s not possible to have a sound argument that is not valid.

Informal Fallacies

Ad Hominem: Attacking the person making the argument rather than the argument itself.

  • Example: “You can’t trust John’s opinion on climate change because he’s a liberal.”

Appeal to Authority: Relying on the authority of an individual or institution without providing evidence to support the claim.

  • Example: “Dr. Smith says that this product works, so it must be effective.”

Five Principles of Honest Dialectical Engagement

  1. Truth-Seeking: A genuine commitment to finding the truth, rather than simply winning an argument.
  2. Open-Mindedness: A willingness to consider alternative viewpoints and to change one’s own beliefs if necessary.
  3. Respectful Dialogue: Engaging in respectful and civil discourse, even when disagreeing with others.
  4. Clarity and Precision: Clearly articulating one’s arguments and avoiding ambiguity.
  5. Critical Thinking: Evaluating arguments carefully and identifying potential biases and fallacies.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.