“An organization with a solid business plan and risk management plan

 

Take a position either in support of or in opposition of the following statement: “An organization with a solid business plan and risk management plan does not need an information security strategy, as long as it has sufficient information security policies and procedures in place.” Explain your position (for or against) and justify your answer.

Sample Solution

“An organization with a solid business plan and risk management plan does not need an information security strategy, as long as it has sufficient information security policies and procedures in place.” I am against the statement. Some say that strategic planning is no longer practical or necessary in today1s rapidly changing technical environment, but strategy still remains an essential part of defining clear company wide goals and how to achieve them. Developing and maintaining an IT security plan is one of the most effective strategies to avoid data loss, theft, and threats. Additionally, it guarantees that your organization is adequately prepared and understands how to respond to an incident.

evil demonstration of an ethnic gathering methodicallly killing another ethnic gathering they live among. In my own story, the causal connection between ethnic clash and slaughter envelops thoughts of each of the three methodologies, which is a widened idea of expansionism that incorporates ethnically unmistakable minorities efficiently oppressed by one more ethnic gathering inside their states. A term I’ll use as ‘intracolonialism’ is the act of complete political and financial mastery of one ethnic gathering over another/others inside a state. The development of intracolonialism inside states was taken from the idea of colonization. In spite of the fact that gatherings have been colonizing different gatherings for a long time, Western Europeans were the most persuasive colonizers as they were first to colonize almost the whole world. Utilizing the British colonization of North America and the decimation they performed onto the Native American populace for instance, it initially started with the publicity of ‘othering’ the local populace. As strain between the locals and the British pilgrim power heightened, British/American powers methodicallly killed Native populaces for land use, gold mining, or other intolerable reasons. This hyper mobilized model of colonization has been recreated in many colonized regions across the globe and, due to the authoritative idea of western culture, has impacted different societies on the most proficient method to ‘appropriately’ rule. Ethnic struggle happens in practically all pieces of the earth, however when one ethnic gathering combines greater part of the power, dread and fierceness lead to fanaticism. Hence, Intracolonization, like colonization, is an essential to ethnic slaughter.

Vital and Sufficient Conditions
Because of the incidental idea of massacre, how late destructive investigations has created, and how little information is accessible, it is challenging to say precisely exact thing the important and adequate circumstances are for ethnic slaughter to happen. That being said, for my hypothetical result, I can deduce that to go from ethnic struggle to decimation, it is first vital for their to be a legitimate system. Utilizing a more limited meaning of dictatorship from the Cambridge word reference as, “the conviction that individuals should obey totally and not be permitted opportunity to go about as they wish,” we can infer that it would be totally ne

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.